Skip to main content
iRubric: Process Design rubric

iRubric: Process Design rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Process Design 
Storage System Design
Evaluation of the Design of a chemical process
Rubric Code: EXBA6W3
By mariagomegal
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Process Design
  Beginner

0 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3.8 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Presentation

Beginner

The document in poorly presented, margins are not aligned, no effort at formatting the cover, sections or titles was made
Fair

It is evident that there was some format used, but either margin alignment, title format, or sections are not evident
Good

The document has been drawn with a coherent format for front page, sections and titles, with care for alignment
Excellent

Format of document includes aspects like a differentiating front cover, with use of color, footnotes, sections, and figures correctly identified.
Spelling & Grammar

Beginner

There are more than 4 different spelling errors and / or the writing is deficient to the point that the idea is not understandable
Fair

There are up to 2 different spelling errors and / or there are sections of the document in which the idea is not completely understandable or clear, or the ideas are truncated or do not flow between each other
Good

There are no spelling errors but there are typing errors that do not prevent the understanding of the text and / or there are ideas that have been written incorrectly, or ideas may not flow from one to another, and /or the lack of use of basic technical vocabulary is evident
Excellent

There are no spelling or typographical errors. The writing is adequate, and flows from one idea to another, the use of technical terminology is evident.
Citation

Beginner

The document does not evidence the use of bibliographic citations on more than 6 occasions, including technical data, images and tables. more than 50% of sources are not valid
Fair

The document does not evidence the use of bibliographic citations on more than 4 occasions, including technical data, images and tables. No more than a 30% o sources are not valid or serious
Good

The document does not evidence the use of bibliographic citations on more than 2 occasions, including technical data, images and tables. Less than 10% of Sources are not valid or serious
Excellent

All citations and references of data sources, tables and figures are found in the document. And all the sources are valid and serious
Design Elementens: selec. reactions

Beginner

There is no description of the the involved reactions, or is extremely vague. Selection of reactions is unsubstantieted. No information on reactives/products was given
Fair

The reactions description is not complete, or there is very little information regarding reaction selection.
Good

The reactions description is given, some information regarding selection was offered. Quantities (flows) were defined and logically calculated
Excellent

Selection of reactions is substantieted. Aditionally other process variables were considered for the reactions : pressure, temperature, others.
Design Elements: mass balance

Beginner

The overall mass balance is not achieved.
Fair

Theoretical quantities (flows) were defined and logically calculated according to stoichiometry.
Good

The overall and partial mass balance considering given efficiency of the equipment are achieved in the process. The process considers the minimum number of required units according to instructions.
Excellent

The overall and partial mass balance considering given efficiency of the equipment are achieved in the process. The process considers more units than the minimum number according to instructions.
Design Elements: limiting reactant

Beginner

The document does not show or consider limiting and/or excess reactants.
Fair

There is consideration of limiting reactant, but no effort was put forth in their explanation.
Good

There is a thought consideration of limiting reactant but calculations are not correct.
Excellent

There is a proper consideration of limiting and excess reactants in qualitative and quantitative terms.
Flow diagram

Beginner

The document does not include a flow diagram or is drawn by hand
Fair

The document includes a flow diagram,but does not illustrate the reactions involved in the process or does not connect the units or does not present values for the currents (flow).
Good

The document includes a flow diagram, illustrates the reactions involved in the process, connects the unit, and present values for the currents (flow).
Excellent

In addition the document includes a summary table, with good detail showing mass flows.
Design coherence

Beginner

The document does not present a logical sequence to the design
Fair

The document shows some reasoning for the design (less than 70%), but ideas are segregated
Good

The document shows coherence in the decision making process, and over 70% of design elements are justified
Excellent

The document shows the thought process for the design, decisions are based on contrasting options and the use of an identifiable criterion for decision making.
Calculations & additional material

Beginner

The document does not contain calculations and/or any complementary information
Fair

The document contains some calculations and/or some complementary information
Good

The document contains all calculations and some complementary information
Excellent

The document contains all calculations and some complementary information. the calculations are correct, and the complementary information is pertinent to the information given in the document



Keywords:
  • chemical engineering workshop

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98