iRubric: Assessment Quality Review Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Assessment Quality Review Rubric

This rubric is used to assess the quality of academic program assessment plans and reports.

Rubric Code: EXACWC4

By cgmartin

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: (none)

Assessment Quality Review Rubric
	None reported 0 pts	Initial 1 pts	Developing 2 pts	Developed 3 pts	Highly Developed 4 pts
Student Learning Outcomes
Measurable	None reported None reported	Initial None of the outcomes are measurable and are written as activities or tasks.	Developing Some outcomes are measurable in that they clearly describe what students should know, be able to do, or value using action verbs.	Developed Most outcomes are measurable in that they clearly describe what students should know, be able to do, or value using action verbs.	Highly Developed All outcomes are measurable in that they clearly describe what students should know, be able to do, or value using action verbs.
Level of Learning	None reported None reported	Initial None of the outcome statements reflect the appropriate level of learning for the program.	Developing Some outcome statements reflect the appropriate level of learning for the program.	Developed Most outcome statements reflect the appropriate level of learning for the program.	Highly Developed All outcome statements reflect the appropriate level of learning for the program.
Assessment Methods
Direct methods	None reported None reported	Initial None of the outcomes have direct assessment methods.	Developing Some outcomes have direct assessment methods	Developed Most outcomes have a direct assessment method.	Highly Developed All outcomes have multiple assessment methods.
Assessment Methods: Alignment	None reported None reported	Initial None of the assessment methods are aligned to the outcomes.	Developing Some of the assessment methods are aligned to the outcomes.	Developed Most of the assessment methods are aligned to the outcomes	Highly Developed All of the assessment methods are aligned to the outcomes.
Assessment Methods: Details	None reported None reported	Initial None of the assessment methods provide details regarding the data collection process, what specifically is being assessed (e.g., rubric criteria, survey item, etc.), and/or how the assessment will be conducted (e.g., two faculty graders, advisory group, etc.).	Developing Some of the assessment methods provide details regarding the data collection process, what specifically is being assessed (e.g., rubric criteria, survey item, etc.), and/or how the assessment will be conducted (e.g., two faculty graders, advisory group, etc.).	Developed Most of the assessment methods provide details regarding the data collection process, what specifically is being assessed (e.g., rubric criteria, survey item, etc.), and/or how the assessment will be conducted (e.g., two faculty graders, advisory group, etc.).	Highly Developed All of the assessment methods provide details regarding the data collection process, what specifically is being assessed (e.g., rubric criteria, survey item, etc.), and/or how the assessment will be conducted (e.g., two faculty graders, advisory group, etc.).
Documentation	None reported None reported	Initial No documentation of assessment methods uploaded (as appropriate).	Developing Some assessment methods have documentation uploaded (as appropriate).	Developed Most assessment methods have documentation uploaded (as appropriate).	Highly Developed Some assessment methods have documentation uploaded (as appropriate).
Criteria
Criteria	None reported None reported	Initial None of the criteria are specific enough to allow judgement of continuous improvement	Developing Some criteria are specific enough to allow judgement of continuous improvement	Developed Most criteria are specific enough to allow judgement of continuous improvement	Highly Developed All criteria are specific enough to allow judgement of continuous improvement
Results
Results: Alignment	None reported None reported	Initial None of the result statements are aligned to the assessment method and criterion.	Developing Some result statements are aligned to the assessment method and criterion.	Developed Most result statements are aligned to the assessment method and criterion.	Highly Developed All result statements are aligned to the assessment method and criterion.
Results: Details	None reported None reported	Initial None of the result statements provide details related to the data collection process such as the number of students assessed, how the data were collected, and number of faculty involved in the assessment activity.	Developing Some result statements provide details related to the data collection process such as the number of students assessed, how the data were collected, and number of faculty involved in the assessment activity	Developed Most result statements provide details related to the data collection process such as the number of students assessed, how the data were collected, and number of faculty involved in the assessment activity	Highly Developed All result statements provide details related to the data collection process such as the number of students assessed, how the data were collected, and number of faculty involved in the assessment activity
Documentation	None reported None reported	Initial No documentation of results uploaded (as appropriate).	Developing Some results have documentation uploaded (as appropriate).	Developed Most results have documentation uploaded (as appropriate).	Highly Developed All results have documentation uploaded (as appropriate).
Use of Results
Alignment: Action planning	None reported None reported	Initial None of the action plans are aligned to the result statement.	Developing Some of the action plans are aligned to the result statements.	Developed Most of the action plans are aligned to the result statements.	Highly Developed All of the action plans are aligned to the result statements.
Details: Action planning	None reported None reported	Initial None of the use of results provide a concrete plan for impacting results in the following year.	Developing Some of the action plans provide a concrete plan for impacting results in the following year.	Developed Most of the action plans provide a concrete plan for impacting results in the following year.	Highly Developed All of the action plans provide a concrete plan for impacting results in the following year.
Faculty review	None reported None reported	Initial None of the result trends provide details or documentation regarding faculty review of assessment results.	Developing Some of the result trends provide details or documentation regarding faculty review of assessment results.	Developed Most of the result trends provide details or documentation regarding faculty review of assessment results.	Highly Developed All of the result trends provide details or documentation regarding faculty review of assessment results.
Follow-up	None reported None reported	Initial None of the follow-up reported provide details related to the implementation of the proposed action plan.	Developing Some of the follow-up reported provide details related to the implementation of the proposed action plan.	Developed Most of the follow-up reported provide de tails related to the implementation of the proposed action plan.	Highly Developed All of the follow-up reported provide details related to the implementation of the proposed action plan.

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric