iRubric: Chewmax- PRC project review check-in rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Chewmax- PRC project review check-in

Chewmax- Kittymax bag prototype 1

Please rate based on completion, quality of work and presentation to your best knowledge

Rubric Code: EX7C834

By cesquive

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

PRC
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 17.5 pts	Needs Improvement 15 pts	Poor 12.5 pts
Thumbnails and logo design	Excellent Completed 80 + thumbnails and displays 4+progression of design ideas that demonstrate a variety of creative solutions	Good Completed 80 thumbnails at least 4 progressions of design (see rubric in folder or ask)	Needs Improvement Completed less than 80 thumbnails with 1-2 progressions of design (see rubric in folder or ask)	Poor Completed less than 40 thumbnails, contains little to no progression of design or doesn't know (see rubric in folder or ask)
Layout Desig	Excellent Final layout follows one of the layouts found in the 10 layouts. The design also demonstrates excellent use of principles and elements of design.	Good Final layout follows most of the of the layout found in the 10 layouts chosen. The design also demonstrates good use of principles and elements of design.	Needs Improvement Final layout follows little to none of the ideas in the layouts found in the 10 layouts. The design also demonstrates little to no use of principles and elements of design.	Poor Final layout follows none of the layouts found in the 10 or less layouts. The design also demonstrates no use of principles and elements of design.
Bag prototype	Excellent All the content required is included and demonstrates little to no craftsmanship errors (crooked, some bubbles, creases, jagged cuts). Cut out window included, displaying basil	Good All the content required is included and demonstrates a 1-2 craftsmanship errors (crooked, some bubbles, creases, jagged cuts)	Needs Improvement Most the content required is included and demonstrates a 3-5 craftsmanship errors (crooked, some bubbles, creases, jagged cuts)	Poor little to none of the content required is included and demonstrates a excessive errors in craftsmanship 5+ (crooked, some bubbles, creases, jagged cuts)
Use of research	Excellent Associate could support 3-5 elements of design and strategy to the research conducted in - Business info form SWOT Analysis Creative brief	Good Associate could support 1-2 elements of design and strategy to the research conducted in - Business info form SWOT Analysis Creative brief	Needs Improvement Associate makes a unsubstantiated connection supporting 0-1 elements of design and strategy to the research conducted in - Business info form SWOT Analysis Creative brief	Poor Associate makes no connection supporting any elements of design and strategy to the research conducted in - Business info form SWOT Analysis Creative brief