iRubric: GingerBread House Peer/self Evaluation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

GingerBread House Peer/self Evaluation

GingerBread House Evaluation

Rubric Code: EX76629

By queenbee17

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 6-8

Gingerbread House
	Poor Lack of effort, improper behavior or use of equipment, wandered out of assigned group, or didn't do assigned kitchen duties (N/A)	Fair Participated with only minimal effort, tendency to wander, minimal cleanup effort, skill level needs improvement (N/A)	Good Practiced good teamwork skills, completed all personal, pre-prep, and prep skills, completed kitchen duties, shows professionalism, good attitude, shows creativity, practices good techniques (N/A)	Excellent Shows leadership skills within group and class, shows professionalism, mastered techniques, shows creativity, completes assigned jobs and kitchen duties. (N/A)
My name	Poor I did not work within group, did not complete assigned tasks, or showed little group participation.	Fair I helped but with minimal effort, wandered out of group part of the time, and only partially helped other team members.	Good I worked within group, did all assigned tasks without prodding.	Excellent I worked within group and demonstrated exceptional teamwork by taking initiative in completing tasks or assisting other members.
Peer Name	Poor Student did not work within his group, did not complete his assigned tasks, or showed little group participation.	Fair Student helped but with minimal effort, wandered out of group part of the time, and only partially helped other team members.	Good Student worked within group, did all assigned tasks without prodding.	Excellent Student worked within group and demonstrated exceptional teamwork by taking initiative in completing tasks or assisting other members.
Peer Name	Poor Student did not work within his group, did not complete his assigned tasks, or showed little group participation.	Fair Student helped but with minimal effort, wandered out of group part of the time, and only partially helped other team members.	Good Student worked within group, did all assigned tasks without prodding.	Excellent Student worked within group and demonstrated exceptional teamwork by taking initiative in completing tasks or assisting other members.
Peer Name	Poor Student did not work within his group, did not complete his assigned tasks, or showed little group participation.	Fair Student helped but with minimal effort, wandered out of group part of the time, and only partially helped other team members.	Good Student worked within group, did all assigned tasks without prodding.	Excellent Student worked within group and demonstrated exceptional teamwork by taking initiative in completing tasks or assisting other members.
Peer Name	Poor Student did not work within his group, did not complete his assigned tasks, or showed little group participation.	Fair Student helped but with minimal effort, wandered out of group part of the time, and only partially helped other team members.	Good Student worked within group, did all assigned tasks without prodding.	Excellent Student worked within group and demonstrated exceptional teamwork by taking initiative in completing tasks or assisting other members.

Keywords:

Exam Lab Evaluation

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric