iRubric: Student Sonnet rubric

The writer's word choice and phrasing appeal to multiple senses; poem uses descriptive language, interesting imagery, and an appropriate tone consistent with the poet's intent; figurative language/sound devices are used effectively.

The writer's word choice and phrasing could be more unique--few senses are realized in the language of the poem. Tone is somewhat developed, yet not strong enough to be truly memorable; figurative language/sound devices lacked effectiveness.

Word choice and phrasing are quite average; few, if any, sensory devices are used to create concrete images. Tone is either off-mark or not apparent. Missing required language devices.

Poem has an engaging title and topic. It is evident that the poet put thought into the composition and was innovative in conveying the ideas and emotions of their topic--good voice.

Poem has an ordinary title; whether the topic was ordinary or not, the poet needed to do more to creatively convey the ideas and emotions related to it.

Poem shows virtually no originality or voice. The poem lacks creativity and appears to be rushed.