Skip to main content

iRubric: Listening Analysys rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Listening Analysys 
Listening Analysys
Observations geared to the IB music exam
Rubric Code: E9CC46
By JCBartz
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Listening analysis
Attention to detail with supporting arguments.
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Musical Genre & Style

Describe what you hear and what kind of music it is.
Poor

Candidate does not properly describe what is heard or the type of music.
Fair

Candidate gives a fair description of what is heard and the type of music, but lacks knowledge and supporting evidence.
Good

Candidate gives an excellent description of what is heard and the type of music, with knowledge and supporting evidence.
Historical Era

Approximate time frame of the music and typical musical characteristics of that era.
Poor

Candidate does not properly identify the historical era and makes no mention of the musical characteristics associated with an era.
Fair

Candidate identifies the historical era but makes no mention of the musical characteristics associated with that era.
Good

Candidate properly identifies the historical era and comments on the musical characteristics associated with that era.
Structural Elements / Composition

Overall form of the work, including but not limited to: rhythm, melody, harmony, instrumentation.
Poor

Candidate does not properly identify any of the structural elements.
Fair

Candidate properly identifies some of the structural elements.
Good

Candidate properly identifies all of the structural elements.
Technical Elements

Analysis of the work and appropriate use of musical terminology.
Poor

Candidate does not offer any analysis or properly identify any of the technical elements. No musical terminology was offered.
Fair

Candidate offers some analysis or properly identifies some of the technical elements. Some musical terminology was used.
Good

Candidate gives a clear analysis and properly identifies the technical elements. Correct musical terminology was used.
Contextual Elements

A description of the nature of the work including but not limited to: tradition, institution, ethnicity, geographic region of origin, intended cultural use or function, emotional expression.
Poor

Candidate does not offer any analysis or properly identify any of the contextual elements.
Fair

Candidate offers some analysis or properly identifies some of the contextual elements.
Good

Candidate gives a clear and convincing analysis of the contextual elements.



Keywords:
  • structural, technical, contextual music analysis

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58