iRubric: Human Dev Project: Activity 3 {SPR 10} rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Human Dev Project: Activity 3 {SPR 10}

Use the flowchart* provided to conduct an observation of the child’s ability to conserve displaced volume. Follow the steps as they are written. Determine the stage of cognitive development (Piaget) based on the results you observe during the assessment. Give a complete description of the assessment and its outcomes; fully explain how you determined the child’s stage of cognitive development.

Rubric Code: E3CBA7

By mthompsonprice

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Psychology

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

HDP: Activity 3
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 1 pts	Good 1.5 pts	Legit 2 pts
Clarity	Poor Writing is not clear. Meaning is difficult to understand. May be excessively wordy.	Fair Several organizational issues. May be too wordy. Several important concepts are not explained.	Good A few org. issues; somewhat wordy. A few important concepts are not well explained.	Legit Clearly written, well-organized, not too wordy. All important concepts explained well and accurately.
Vocabulary	Poor Does not use vocabulary from Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development.	Fair Uses some vocabulary from Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development but may be applied incorrectly.	Good Uses most vocabulary from Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development but may be applied incorrectly.	Legit Uses vocabulary from Piagets Theory of Cognitive Development to describe outcome of the assessment. All terms used in correct context and accurately.
Follows Directions	Poor Clearly did not follow project directions. Missing multiple parts of the project (instructor will list missing parts when giving feedback)	Fair Skipped 1+ steps in the project; missing either use of flowchart, full description of results, stage estimation, and/or explanation of how stage was determined.	Good Skipped no more than 1 step in the project; missing either use of flowchart, full description of results, stage estimation, and/or explanation of how stage was determined.	Legit Follows all directions for this project: uses flowchart, fully describes results, gives stage estimation and explains how stage was determined.
Composition	Poor Multiple Errors - not Professional Writing 12+ errors	Fair Needs Proofreading 8-11 errors	Good Needs Proofreading 4-7 errors	Legit Professional Writing 0-3 errors
Supporting Details	Poor No supporting details	Fair Statements are generally not supported by adequate detail.	Good Most statements are supported by details but some detail is lacking.	Legit Statements are supported by details such as illustrations, examples, quotes from the participant, or other observations.