iRubric: E-learning Evaluation Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

E-learning Evaluation Rubric

To be used in evaluating graduate online courses.

Rubric Code: E374B2

By sillysully

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: (Other)

Grade Levels: Graduate

E-learning Evaluation Rubric This evaluation rubric is to be used to evaluate online graduate courses.
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
Goals and objectives of the course	Poor Not clearly stated or were inaccurate; unrelated to course content.	Fair Somewhat clearly stated and were somewhat accurate.	Good Clearly stated and accurate with relevancy to the course content.	Excellent Clearly stated, accurate, and clear connections made to the content of the course with detailed goals and objectives.
Syllabus	Poor Did not receive a syllabus for the course or it was not complete or included errors. No specific information, generic in nature.	Fair Somewhat informative syllabus was received, however, a few minor errors were listed. Some information was lacking.	Good Clear syllabus which included professor information, course information, and no errors.	Excellent Clear syllabus which included professor information, detailed course information, and no errors. Student assessment rubrics were included for various assignments/projects.
Resources used in this course	Poor Provided no additional learning resources or references to enhance student learning in this course.	Fair Provided limited learning resources or references to enhance student learning in this course.	Good Provided adequate learning resources or references to enhance student learning in this course.	Excellent Provided significant learning resources to enhance student learning in this course. All links and reference materials were accurate and properly linked for easy access.
Technology tools used in the course	Poor No additional multimedia or other technology tools were used to facilitate learning.	Fair Limited use of multimedia or other technology tools were used to facilitate learning.	Good Adequate use of multimedia or other technology tools were used to facilitate learning.	Excellent Variety of multimedia or other technology tools were used to facilitate learning throughout the course.
PRESENTATION DESIGN
Structure of the course units	Poor Not clearly organized into appropriate units and lessons, no overview of the material provided, no explanation of objectives and activities for the unit.	Fair Somewhat organized into appropriate units and lessons, limited information relative to the unit.	Good Adequate organization of units with a clear description of the objectives, activities, and resources that frame each unit.	Excellent Highly organized units with clear descriptions on the objectives, activities, and resources that frame each unit. An overview was provided for each unit or lesson in the course. Student assessment of the unit was requested at the end of each unit.
Aesthetic design of the course	Poor Does not present and communicate course information clearly or in a visually-pleasing fashion.	Fair Vaguely presents and communicates course information and presents information in a visually pleasing fashion.	Good Adequately presents and communicates course information clearly and presents information in a visually pleasing fashion.	Excellent Thoroughly presents and communicates course information clearly and presents information in a visually pleasing fashion throughout the course.
INTERACTION DESIGN
Student-Student interaction	Poor No contact between the students.	Fair Limited contact between students.	Good Adequate contact between students such as discussion board assignments.	Excellent Significant contact between students such as discussion board assignments, group project work assignments, and other opportunities for collaboration.
Instructor-Student interaction	Poor No direct contact between the instructor and student during this course other than the submission of assignments and posting of grades.	Fair Limited contact between the instructor and student during this course beyond the submission of assignments and posting of grades.	Good Adequate contact between instructor and student during this course beyond the submission of assignments and posting of grades.	Excellent Significant contact between instructor and student during this course beyond the submission of assignments and posting of grades. Instructor participated in online discussion groups, provided timely feedback to student questions or assignments, and actively participated in the course experience.
Feedback on student performance	Poor No feedback was provided to the student about their performance in the course.	Fair Infrequent and sporadic feedback was provided to the student about their performance in the course	Good Regular feedback about student performance was provided in a timely manner throughout the course.	Excellent Regular feedback about student performance was provided in a timely manner throughout the course. Feedback includes detailed review of work, appropriate links or sharing of ideas for further learning.

Keywords:

online course evaluation, elearning rubric, graduate evaluation

Subjects:

Education

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric