Skip to main content

iRubric: Medical Test Two rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Medical Test Two 
Specialized Competency Evaluation for DPS Review
Rubric Code: E253XA2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Post Graduate

Powered by iRubric DPS Review
Specialized Competency
  Not Demonstrated

The supervisee does not demonstrate the skill.

0 pts

Partially Demonstrated / major gaps

The supervisee does not meet the average skill level as compared to their level of experience.

1 pts

Meets Standard

The supervisee meets the average skill level as compared to their experience.

2 pts

Exceeds Standard

The supervisee exceeds the average skill level as compared to their experience.

4 pts

Process Completion & Coverage (Critical)

Checks: Reviewer completed the H72 run correctly and addressed the required set of items; no obvious omissions.

0 Review is incomplete / wrong scope / missing required item types

1 Partial; misses key categories (duplicates/updates/geo/etc.)

2 Completed correctly; covers the required item types

3 Completed thoroughly; demonstrates strong organization and systematic coverage

Required comment: “Was the run complete and scoped correct

Not Demonstrated
Partially Demonstrated / major gaps
Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Change Detection & Judgment (Critical)

Checks: Correctly identifies what changed (or didn’t), and chooses the right action (update, merge, escalate, no change).

0 Frequent incorrect calls; wrong updates/incorrect “no change”

1 Mixed accuracy; needs guidance on borderline calls

2 Good judgment; correct calls in common cases

3 Excellent judgment; anticipates edge cases and explains decisions clearly

Required comment: “Any incorrect decisions? Which ones?”

Not Demonstrated
Partially Demonstrated / major gaps
Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Duplicate Identification & Resolution (Critical)

Checks: Uses deconfliction methods, identifies duplicates, resolves correctly (merge/link/update) without data loss.

0 Misses obvious duplicates or resolves incorrectly

1 Finds some, but inconsistent resolution or weak rationale

2 Correctly identifies and resolves duplicates; rationale logged

3 Handles complex duplicates confidently; improves consistency for downstream data use

Required comment: “How were duplicates confirmed and r

Not Demonstrated
Partially Demonstrated / major gaps
Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Data Integrity of Updates (Critical)

Checks: Change log is complete, clear, and allows another reviewer to understand/replicate decisions.

0 No log / not auditable

1 Incomplete log; missing rationale or item links

2 Clear log with links and rationale for actions taken

3 Excellent audit trail; includes patterns noted and proactive notes to team

Required comment: “Is the log sufficient for audit?”

Not Demonstrated
Partially Demonstrated / major gaps
Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Standards & Policy Compliance (Critical)

Checks: Follows FORESIGHT standards and policies (privacy/OSINT monitoring constraints), correct handling of sensitive content.

0 Policy/standards violations or unsafe handling

1 Some questionable calls; needs reminders

2 Compliant; escalates when unsure

3 Proactively flags risks and improves team compliance practices

Required comment: “Any compliance concerns?”

Not Demonstrated
Partially Demonstrated / major gaps
Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Efficiency & Workflow Hygiene (Non-critical)

Checks: Uses tools effectively; maintains pace without sacrificing quality; avoids rework.

0 Inefficient/unstructured; creates rework

1 Some inefficiency; inconsistent method

2 Efficient enough; repeatable approach

3 Highly efficient; suggests improvements/templates

Not Demonstrated
Partially Demonstrated / major gaps
Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Escalation Quality (Non-critical)

Checks: Escalations are appropriate, well-documented, and timely.

0 Escalations missing/wrong or poorly documented

1 Escalations sometimes appropriate but unclear

2 Appropriate escalations with clear rationale

3 Excellent escalation decisions; improves team handling of edge cases

Not Demonstrated
Partially Demonstrated / major gaps
Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard



Keywords:
  • DPS


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n126