Skip to main content
iRubric: Ceramic Tile Pattern Design rubric

iRubric: Ceramic Tile Pattern Design rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Ceramic Tile Pattern Design 
Greek Ceramic Tile
Ceramic Tile inspired by culture, environment, and personal interest.
Rubric Code: E23CX9C
By Evelynlr
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Hand Built pots
  Criteria Description

(N/A)

Excellent

5 pts

Good+

4 pts

Average

3 pts

Needs Improvement

1 pts

Construction

Criteria Description

Is the tile constructed according to directions. Width, length, height compare to example tile.
Does the tile looks complete.
Is the tile symmetrical.
Did the student used the standard, explained directions to build the tile? If needed did the student use a cut out template.
Excellent

The tile is constructed as given in directions. The depth, width and length match that of the example tile. The tile is symmetrical. A lot of time spent working on the tile.
Good+

The tile construction is very close to the directions. Depth, length and width are very close to example tile. The tile is very close symmetrical, and it looks like a good amount of time was spent working on the tile.
Average

The tile is a little closer to the construction given in directions.
The depth, length and width are somewhat closer to the example tile. It does not quite look complete. The tile is not completely symmetrical. It looks as though a little more time could be spent working on the tile.
Needs Improvement

The Tile is not constructed according to directions., Its depth, height and width do not match the example tile. the tile seems incomplete.
The tile is not symmetrical is not level, it looks as though there was not enough time spent working on the tile.
Design/Creativity

Criteria Description

How complex was the chosen design for the tile?
How much creativity was put into the design on the tile?
How well did the student transfer the design onto the tile?
Excellent

High complexity of design. Student took seriously the design they chose. High level of creativity. Transfer was near perfect and time was taken to ensure a good product.
Good+

A good amount of complexity in design. The student took time to choose design. A good amount of creativity shown. Transfer to tile was carefully done.
Average

Some complexity of design. The student took a little time to choose this design. But still a little rushed. A little creativity shown. Somewhat neater transfer but still a bit sloppy.
Needs Improvement

No complexity. No time taken to choose a design. It appears the student rushed just to get something. No creativity shown. Sloppy transfer to tile, rushed.
Fulfills Assignment

Criteria Description

Did the student meet the student criteria that was discussed for assignment? Student Included a positive (Embossment) and negative (Incising) skill learned throughout the lesson. Student use their thumbnail pattern design to inspire their work.
Excellent

The student did cover all of the criteria for the assignment.
Good+

Student did not cover all of the criteria but did cover at least 3/4 of the criteria for the assignment.
Average

Student did not cover all of the criteria but did cover half of the criteria for the assignment.
Needs Improvement

Appears as though the student paid little attention to the criteria that was discussed for the assignment.
Effort

Criteria Description

Was the student willing to learn new ideas and processes?
Did the student work consistently on project?
Excellent

Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student gave undivided to completion of project. Student used class time effectively to complete project.
Good+

Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student paid attention to work on project. Student used most time in class appropriately.
Average

Student is learning new processes and ideas. Student should pay more attention to project during class. Student used some time appropriately.
Needs Improvement

Student is unwilling to learn new ideas and processes. Student ignored repeated requests to focus the project .
Student wasted most of class time.
Assessment

Criteria Description

The student completed and participated in peer critique and self-assessment.
Excellent

The student answered questions in the google form with appropriate answers, and complete sentences, and used new vocabulary learned during the lesson.
Good+

The student answered most questions. The student gave answers that used some new vocabulary, full sentences, and appropriate well-thought answers.
Average

The student answered half of the questions. The student gave half-effort answers that used some new vocabulary, full sentences, and appropriate well-thought answers.
Needs Improvement

The student answered very few questions. The student gave little or no effort in answering questions during peer critique and self reflection.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16