Skip to main content
iRubric: French II Cooking Show Video (Group Evaluation) rubric

iRubric: French II Cooking Show Video (Group Evaluation) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
French II Cooking Show Video (Group Evaluation) 
French II Cooking Show (Group Evaluation)
End of quarter group project
Rubric Code: DXXWXAB
By toddt14
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric French II Cooking Show
(Group Evaluation)
  Chefs de cuisine!

5 pts

Sous-chefs

4 pts

Chefs de partie

3 pts

Cuisiniers

2 pts

Score

(N/A)

Task Completion

Refer to checklist of required elements
Chefs de cuisine!

Presenters indicate all of the ingredients for the dish, all appliances and cooking utensils used, and step-by-step instructions for how to prepare the dish. <BR>
<BR>
Demonstration includes (or exceeds) required vocabulary and grammar.
Sous-chefs

Presenters indicate most of the ingredients for the dish, most appliances and cooking utensils, and instructions for how to prepare the dish. <BR>
<BR>
Demonstration includes most of the required vocabulary and grammar.
Chefs de partie

Presenters indicate some of the ingredients for the dish, some appliances and cooking utensils, and some instructions for how to prepare the dish. Presentation lacks some critical vocabulary. <BR>
<BR>
Demonstration only partially includes the required vocabulary and grammar.
Cuisiniers

Presenters indicate minimal or insufficient amount of ingredients, appliances/cooking utensils, and instructions for how to prepare the dish. <BR>
<BR>
Demonstration severely lacks the required vocabulary and grammar.
Score
Organization & Clarity

Chefs de cuisine!

Presenters introduce all appliances, utensils, ingredients, and procedures in an orderly, comprehensible manner. Viewers are able to follow along easily and could duplicate the recipe without much trouble.
Sous-chefs

Presenters name most appliances, utensils, ingredients, and procedures, though organization is less clear and following the instructions is more difficult; more sequencing is necessary
Chefs de partie

Presentation lacks some critical vocabulary of appliances, utensils and ingredients; appropriate sequencing guides are missing which makes comprehension difficult.
Cuisiniers

Presentation severely lacks organization. Listener/viewer is not able to easily follow.
Score
Delivery & Accuracy

Chefs de cuisine!

Presenters speak clearly and audibly with few pronunciation errors. All vocabulary and grammar items are used correctly.
Group stays in French (or effectively edits out the English) for the whole video.
Sous-chefs

Presenters speak clearly and audibly, but there are some errors in pronunciation. There are a few grammatical errors and/or errors in use of vocabulary. Group stays in French almost exclusively, with an occasional slip.
Chefs de partie

Presenters do not always speak clearly and audibly. There are several errors in pronunciation, grammar and vocabulary usage. Group has several slips into English.
Cuisiniers

Presenters do not speak clearly or audibly. There are so many pronunciation errors and misuses of necessary vocabulary or grammatical structures that the presentation is difficult to understand. Group uses English often.
Score
Preparedness

Chefs de cuisine!

Group members are well prepared and have obviously rehearsed many times. Lines are memorized for the most part, or the reading is not obvious.
Sous-chefs

Group members are prepared and have rehearsed a couple of times. Most lines have been learned and do not have to be read, or the reading is only occasionally obvious.
Chefs de partie

Group members are somewhat prepared and have not rehearsed much. Line reading is obvious.
Cuisiniers

Group is not prepared, and it is obvious that demonstration has not been rehearsed prior to making. Group members have to rely on reading scripts exclusively.
Score
Creativity

Chefs de cuisine!

Demonstration shows originality and is enhanced by props, costumes, and music. Demonstration generates a strong interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others.
Sous-chefs

Demonstration shows originality and is enhanced by either props, costumes or music. Demonstration generates interest and enthusiasm about the topic in others.
Chefs de partie

Demonstration shows some originality, but lacks props, costumes and music. Demonstration hardly generates interest or enthusiasm about the topic in others.
Cuisiniers

Demonstration lacks originality and includes no props, costumes, or music. Demonstration generates neither interest nor enthusiasm about the topic in others.
Score
Visuals

Chefs de cuisine!

Use of visuals (video footage, digital photos, or images) greatly enhances demonstration and helps audience to follow the creation of the dish.
Sous-chefs

Use of visuals often enhances demonstration
Chefs de partie

Use of visuals somewhat enhances demonstration, though may be random, distracting or disorganized.
Cuisiniers

Lack of/minimal use of visuals fails to enhance demonstration and does not help audience to understand/follow the creation of the dish.
Score
Collaboration with Peers

Chefs de cuisine!

Each person in the group contributes equally to the speaking part of the demonstration. Each person in the group contributes equally to the script. Each person contributes equally to the cooking part of the demonstration.
Sous-chefs

1-2 members of group perform most of the demonstration (speaking AND cooking)
Chefs de partie

One person in the group does most of the presenting. One person in the group does most of the cooking.
Cuisiniers

One person 'carries' the entire presentation. One person in the group does ALL of the cooking.
Score
Length of Presentation

Chefs de cuisine!

Presentation lasts 5-8 minutes.
Sous-chefs

Presentation lasts 9-10 minutes or less than 5 minutes.
Chefs de partie

Presentation lasts 11-12 minutes or less than 3 minutes.
Cuisiniers

Presentation is 2 minute or less, or exceeds 12 minutes.
Score
Completion of checklist

Chefs de cuisine!

Group uses the checklist effectively and each checklist item is included in the video.
Sous-chefs

Group gets most of the checklist items into the video.
Chefs de partie

Group forgets 2-3 checklist items.
Cuisiniers

group forgets more than 3 of the items from the checklist.
Score
Completed dish

MUST NOT CONTAIN NUTS OF ANY KIND!!!
Chefs de cuisine!

Group brings competed dish to share with the class on Monday.
The dish looks appetizing and like the dish they are supposed to prepare. The project was approved by the teacher and does not contain nuts.
Sous-chefs

The group brings the dish, but the food does not look much like the dish they were preparing. The project was approved by the teacher and does not contain nuts.
Chefs de partie

The group does not bring a dish or the project was not approved by the teacher.
Cuisiniers

The dish contains nuts or was not approved prior to project.
Score






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98