Skip to main content
iRubric: Superintendent Interview Guide:  ___________________________ rubric

iRubric: Superintendent Interview Guide: ___________________________ rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Superintendent Interview Guide: ___________________________ 
For superintendent interviews July, 2019
Rubric Code: DXCA355
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric Applicant: __________
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Superior

4 pts

Personal Notes

Comments or notes

(N/A)

Leadership

Poor

Appears unsure of what leadership entails; has no grasp of his/her leadership style; has little to no knowledge of components collaborative and inclusionary processes for staff/ community buy-in.
Fair

Communicates vague understanding of leadership and some knowledge of collaborative, distributive leadership to secure buy in from staff/community.
Good

Communicates satisfactorily leadership style and has average handle on how to empower staff/community and create the conditions for staff/community buy-in through distributive leadership when appropriate.
Superior

Communicates with depth and ease his/her leadership style and possesses or appears to possess thorough examples of leadership skills and examples of empowerment of staff/community; understands how to ensure buy-in from staff/community through collaborative, distributive leadership when appropriate.
Personal Notes
Accountability

Poor

Appears unsure of what accountability entails; has no grasp of his/her need to ensure follow through on promises/directives.
Fair

Communicates vague understanding of accountability and some knowledge of how to ensure staff/community buy in on promises/directives.
Good

Communicates satisfactory knowledge of accountability, how to empower staff/community and create the conditions for staff/community confidence that he/she will follow through on promises made or on policies/directives given.
Superior

Communicates with depth and ease his/her accountability style and possesses or appears to possess thorough examples; understands how to ensure consistency in practice throughout staff and how to make this transparent to community.
Personal Notes
Fiscal Management

Poor

Has no experience in fiscal management or has a dismal track record when it comes to fiscal matters. Is not able to give any examples or elaborate about the budgeting process.
Fair

Has little experience in fiscal management or has poor track record when it comes to fiscal matters. Examples are inappropriate and there is very little elaboration about the budgeting process.
Good

Has satisfactory experience in fiscal management or has an adequate track record when it comes to fiscal matters. Examples are appropriate and there is some elaboration about the budgeting process.
Superior

Has extensive experience in fiscal management or has a superior track record when it comes to fiscal matters. Examples are appropriate and there is considerable elaboration about the budgeting process.
Personal Notes
Building Management

Poor

Cannot articulate the managerial role of the administration as it applies to the daily operation of the school and the various functions associated with it. Answers awkwardly.
Fair

Poor articulation of the managerial role of the administration as it applies to the daily operation of the school and the various functions associated with it. Seems to be uncomfortable and vague.
Good

Satisfactory articulation of the managerial role of the administration as it applies to the daily operation of the school and the various functions associated with it. Answers are well developed and reflect concrete understanding.
Superior

Superior articulation of the managerial role of the administration as it applies to the daily operation of the school and the various functions associated with it. Answers are fully developed and reflect extensive knowledge of daily management.
Personal Notes
Strategic Planning

Poor

Has never been involved with a strategic planning process and cannot articulate the processes and steps involved.
Fair

Has had limited involvement with a strategic planning process and articulation of the processes and steps involved is inadequate. Has never led a strategic planning process.
Good

Has had some involvement with a strategic planning process and can articulate the processes and steps involved. Has led a strategic planning process.
Superior

Has extensive involvement with a strategic planning process and can articulate the processes and steps involved. Has led at least one strategic planning process.
Personal Notes
Public Relations/School Image

Poor

Has no experience with public relations or marketing. Cannot articulate any ideas as to how PR relates to the success of a school.
Fair

Has very little experience with public relations. Can articulate few ideas as to how PR relates to the success of a school.
Good

Has sufficient experience with public relations. Can articulate ideas as to how PR relates to the success of a school.
Superior

Has extensive experience with public. Can articulate many ideas as to how PR relates to the success of a school.
Personal Notes
Communication Skills

Poor

Essential communication and written skills are missing.
Fair

Several of the essential communication and written skills are missing.
Good

Has skills needed to communicate both orally and in writing. Has a good command of the English language. Communicates with Principal, staff and community through a few mediums.
Superior

Has excellent skills needed to communicate both orally and in writing. Has a superior command of the English language. Good communicator with Principal, staff and community through various mediums.
Personal Notes
Curriculum Diversification

Poor

No understanding of curriculum diversification;how to differentiate by ability level or interests.
Fair

Has little understanding of curriculum diversification;how to differentiate by ability level or interests.
Good

Has some understanding of curriculum diversification;how to differentiate by ability level or interests. Adequate but does not think out of the box.
Superior

Demonstrates exceptional understanding curriculum diversification;how to differentiate by ability level or interests. Gives examples of out of the box solutions and inclusivity
Personal Notes
Community Collaboration

Poor

Has no experience with community collaboration or partnering. Cannot articulate any ideas as to the mutual benefits or importance.
Fair

Has very little experience with community collaboration or partnering. Can only articulate a few ideas as to the mutual benefits or importance.
Good

Has sufficient experience with with community collaboration or partnering. Can articulate ideas as to the mutual benefits or importance.
Superior

Has extensive experience with community collaboration or partnering and gives examples. Can articulate ideas as to the mutual benefits or importance.
Personal Notes



Keywords:
  • Superintendent Interviews

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98