iRubric: Chemie Protokoll rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Chemie Protokoll

Chemistry Lab Reports

A general rubric for grading chemistry lab reports.

Rubric Code: DX3W488

By apetersr

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Chemistry

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Enter rubric title
	Not Attempted 0 pts	Unacceptable 1 pts	Acceptable 2 pts	Competent 3 pts	Examplary 4 pts
Format	Not Attempted none of the required format elements are followed	Unacceptable Missing 4 or more required sections; report done in pencil or extremely messy; no headings are present	Acceptable Missing 2 or 3 required sections; report handwritten but neatly done in blue or black ink; missing headings	Competent Missing 1 required section; reports is typed but not to parameters; not all headings are present	Examplary All required sections are included; the report is typed using given parameters; headings are present
Language	Not Attempted So poorly written as to be incomprehensible	Unacceptable Minimal control of grammar, punctuation, spelling and sentence formation; multiple errors make determining meaning difficult	Acceptable Limited control of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence formation; frequent errors, both major and minor	Competent Sufficient control of grammar, punctuation, spelling and sentence formation; several errors, but usually minor	Examplary Evident control of grammar, punctuation, spelling, and sentence formation; very few minor errors
Materials/Methods	Not Attempted Not done	Unacceptable Many materials are missing, and the procedure is missing many steps or is indecipherable; the citation is incorrect; no changes in the procedure are listed	Acceptable Some materials are missing; lab procedure is incomplete, but could be followed by someone who had already done the lab; citation is incomplete; most changes in the procedure are not noted	Competent Missing minor materials or information that could reasonably be guessed by someone unfamiliar with the lab; citation is correct though format is wrong; most changes in procedure are noted	Examplary Written in such a way that the reader could repeat the experiment exactly using nothing but the lab report; only trivial or unimportant information is missing; citation is correctly done with corrections noted
Data/Results	Not Attempted Not done	Unacceptable Data is mostly incomplete or incorrect; missing written summary; data format is unacceptable or indecipherable	Acceptable Written summary is missing; some ata is missing or its incorrect; charts and graphs are missing important format elements or are incomplete	Competent Data is complete and predominantly correct but graph or chart format may be consistently missing elements; my be missing written summary of data	Examplary Contains written summary of data; all data tables and graphs are formatted correctly; all data is reported correctly and completely; mistakes are few and trivial
Conclusion	Not Attempted Not done	Unacceptable Many sections are missing or are incomplete or incorrect; no real explanation of data is given; conclusions are not drawn or are so short that they are incomprehensible; sections show little to no evidence of though, understanding, or effort; superficial/limited content	Acceptable Conclusion is complete or missing one section but many of the sections are trivial, incorrect, or not well-thought out; there is little to no theoretical explanation; the hypothesis is unsupported and a clear understanding of the lab is not evident; limited content with inadequate explanation	Competent Conclusion is complete; some ideas are trivial, some well-thought out; hypothesis is supported and most data is explained, though not all at a theoretical level; it shows clear evidence of understanding of the topic and purpose; sufficiently developed content with adequate explanation	Examplary Conclusion is complete and includes thought about all results, not just those related to experimental hypothesis; hypothesis is supported by evidence; observations are interesting and show a deep level of thought and understanding; theoretical explanations are given for results; substantial, specific and illustrative content demonstrating strong development and sophisticated ideas

Subjects:

Chemistry

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric