iRubric: Pathophysiology Case Study Grading Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Pathophysiology Case Study Grading Rubric

Rubric for case studies. Case studies should be no longer than 2 pages.

Rubric Code: DX3BBX5

By zoemel

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Nursing

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Case Study
	A: Exceptional 50 pts	B: Competent 40 pts	C: Marginal 10 pts	D: Ineffective 5 pts	F: Failing 0 pts
Scope and comprehension Clearness, completeness, & purposefulness of response to topic issues.	A: Exceptional Response is focused & compelling. Details are richly presented in a purposeful and concise argument.	B: Competent Clearly presented and purposeful response: Details may lack in richness or fail to compel the reader.	C: Marginal Clear response that may lack supporting details: May contain unnecessary, distracting, and/or superfluous content.	D: Ineffective Response is somewhat clear: Some information does not support the central theme, is limited, and/or inconsequential	F: Failing Topic not answered or response is unclear and/or argument without purpose. And/or writer has cut and pasted (plagiarized) part of paper.
Analysis Analysis of the topic, depth of thought process	A: Exceptional The analysis is well reasoned, logical sequenced and rational: Thoughtful and convincing response clearly demonstrates depth of topic knowledge	B: Competent Response is well reasoned, logically sequences, and rational: Although knowledge is demonstrated, the argument is not strikingly convincing	C: Marginal Response is mostly reasoned, logically sequences, and rational: Depth of analysis and/or organization and/or topic knowledge may be lacking	D: Ineffective Response is unconvincing and/or disorganized: Response demonstrates an insufficient analysis and/or topic knowledge is not demonstrated.	F: Failing Analysis is not attempted or the response fails to demonstrate effort or address the central topic theme
Relevance Uses relevant, peer reviewed literature from credible sources to support written content.	A: Exceptional Points of the presentation are supported by relevant, peer reviewed literature	B: Competent Citations supporting points made in the paper are adequate, peer reviewed, and scholarly but not always used appropriately	C: Marginal Citations are not relevant, not recent, or are from questionable cites (e.g. not peer reviewed or scholarly)	D: Ineffective Lacks necessary citations and/or literature support.	F: Failing Credible references are not supplied.