Skip to main content
iRubric: Prezi Project for the Partial Exam rubric

iRubric: Prezi Project for the Partial Exam rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Prezi Project for the Partial Exam 
Prezi Project for the Partial Exam
Rubric for assessing the prezi task for the partial exam
Rubric Code: D9W4C3
By hartmaa1
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric LANGUAGE
30 %
  Poor

0.5 pts

Fair

1.5 pts

Good

2 pts

Grammar

Poor

Poor command of grammar. Several mistakes found in basic grammar patterns (agreements S-V, past forms of verbs, etc.)
Fair

Good command of most grammar patterns used. Some mistakes are identifiable but not in basic grammar (probably due to risk taking)
Good

Excellent command of grammar patterns used. No mistakes are evident in the presentation
Spelling

Poor

Poor command of spelling. Several mistakes found in basic vocabulary
Fair

Good command of spelling. Rare mistakes found in spelling.
Good

Perfect spelling in the presentation. No evident mistakes in the presentation
Coherence and Organization

Poor

Not enough information presented and no noticeable effort iat presenting the ideas clearly for the audience.The ideas are poorly organized and linked.
Fair

Good organization, there is a logical connection evident to the audience between and idea and the next although there are still some points that could be improved.
Good

Excellent organization, use of discourse markers in the text or other cohesive devices to emphasize the logical connection between and idea and the next The graphic organization reinforces the ideas presented in the texts.
USE OF PREZI
50 % Technical effort to use the tools.
  Poor

0.5 pts

Fair

1.5 pts

Good

2 pts

Path

Poor

No path created to navigate the presentation. Presenters must show the presentaton manually. Some of the elements in the path do not have much meaning.
Fair

Although there's visible effort done to create a path, some elements are left outside or are not shown as they should (images upturned, some images are shown but not the text)
Good

Well organized and clear, it shows clearly the organization of the ideas. The path works as it should presenting.
Images

Poor

Not enough images to illustrate the main points of the task. (Less than 5)
Fair

Good care in general terms in the selection of the images although some of them could be improved.
The number of images is the minimum required in the task. (5)
Good

Excellently choosen images. They successfully illustrate or reinforce the ideas presented. They go beyond the minimum required (more than 5)
Contrast

Poor

Poor or no contrast between text and background in most sections. Colors and background haven't been properly considered for facilitating reading.
Fair

Good contrast between text and background although there are occasions when an effort must be done to read the text.
Good

Excellent contrast between text and background. Colors have been carefully considered for facilitating reading.
Dramatic Effects

Poor

No thought seems to have been given to the use of dramatic effects to surprise or engage the audience.
Fair

Some effort done at engaging the audience although the effects do not surprise or could be technically improved (size of texts or images, concepts...)
Good

Impressive effects coming from the project as a whole (selection of images and videos, text and graphic presentation) The use of zooming reinforces the ideas presented.
Videos

Poor

No videos have been included or they are of poor quality. No much effort seems to have done on this point (the video seems to have been selected just for meeting the item)
Fair

The presentation has a video that is clearly related to the topic.
Good

More than one video included or really excellent choice for reinforcing the ideas presented.
Extension

Poor

Not enough information presented (15 steps, 1 video, images)
Fair

Just the minimum items presented (15 steps, 1 video, images)
Good

Abundance of information. The students went beyond the minimum expected.
TASK
20 %
  Poor

0.5 pts

Fair

1.5 pts

Good

2 pts

Authors (credits)

Poor

No authors are mentioned in the presentation.
No credit is given to the authors of the resources included in the project.
Fair

The authorship of some resources is recognised although there are some elements that remain anonimous
Good

The authors of the presentation are mentioned in it as well as the source(s) of the materials employed(video, image, quotation if it applies)
Language Usefulness

Poor

The project has not much language usefulness either as explanation or example for prospective students.
Fair
Good

The project constitutes a good example or explanation for future students of English.



Keywords:
  • CALL, Prezi


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16