iRubric: Personal Leadership Growth Plan rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Personal Leadership Growth Plan

Rubric Code: D4W7WX

By njmenser

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: (none)

Enter rubric title
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Written Expression	Good Grammatically correct Free from distracting errors Evidence of careful editing Accurate spelling *Professional vocabulary	Fair Grammatically sound Contains some grammatical and/or spelling errors Some evidence of editing Adult vocabulary	Poor Contains numerous grammatical and/or spelling errors Weak vocabulary
Organization	Good Tightly organized and easy to follow Contains a thorough list of strategies for improvement and indicators of success	Fair Displays some organization Contains a list of strategies for improvement and indicators of success	Poor Lack of organization and is difficult to follow Strategies for improvement and indicators for success may be included, but are not appropriate to meet the goals
Content	Good Goals are supported by a thorough rationale demonstrating a strong need for improvement Evidence of careful thought and thorough reflection	Fair Goals are supported by a rationale demonstrating the need for improvement Evidence of reflection and analysis	Poor Goals are supported by a weak rationale that does not demonstrate a need for improvement Little evidence of thoughtful reflection
Monitoring / Adjusting	Good PGLP is monitored and adjusted very regularly to add/delete goals as necessary Goals added demonstrate a deeper understanding of the candidate's current job and explore deficiencies outside the realm of comfort.	Fair PGLP is monitored and adjusted regularly to add/delete goals as necessary Goals added demonstrate some growth in the candidate's current job, but do not necessarily take her out of the normal job responsibilities	Poor PGLP is developed, but rarely monitored or adjusted to add/delete goals as necessary Goals added demonstrate little or no growth in the candidate's current job and do not take her out of the normal job responsibilities

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More (General) rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Enter rubric title
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Written Expression	Good Grammatically correct Free from distracting errors Evidence of careful editing Accurate spelling *Professional vocabulary	Fair Grammatically sound Contains some grammatical and/or spelling errors Some evidence of editing Adult vocabulary	Poor Contains numerous grammatical and/or spelling errors Weak vocabulary
Organization	Good Tightly organized and easy to follow Contains a thorough list of strategies for improvement and indicators of success	Fair Displays some organization Contains a list of strategies for improvement and indicators of success	Poor Lack of organization and is difficult to follow Strategies for improvement and indicators for success may be included, but are not appropriate to meet the goals
Content	Good Goals are supported by a thorough rationale demonstrating a strong need for improvement Evidence of careful thought and thorough reflection	Fair Goals are supported by a rationale demonstrating the need for improvement Evidence of reflection and analysis	Poor Goals are supported by a weak rationale that does not demonstrate a need for improvement Little evidence of thoughtful reflection
Monitoring / Adjusting	Good PGLP is monitored and adjusted very regularly to add/delete goals as necessary Goals added demonstrate a deeper understanding of the candidate's current job and explore deficiencies outside the realm of comfort.	Fair PGLP is monitored and adjusted regularly to add/delete goals as necessary Goals added demonstrate some growth in the candidate's current job, but do not necessarily take her out of the normal job responsibilities	Poor PGLP is developed, but rarely monitored or adjusted to add/delete goals as necessary Goals added demonstrate little or no growth in the candidate's current job and do not take her out of the normal job responsibilities