Skip to main content

iRubric: Critical Thinking Essay rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Critical Thinking Essay 
Medical Lab case study essay
Rubric Code: D3985B
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Exam  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Case evaluation essay
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Above average

4 pts

Outstanding

5 pts

Exceptional

6 pts

Focus

Poor

Addresses topic but has no focus
Fair

Addresses topic but may lose focus by including extraneous or loosely related ideas
Good

Focussed but may contain ideas that are loosely connected to the topic
Above average

Focussed on topic and includes few, if any, loosely related ideas.
Outstanding

Focussed on the topic
Exceptional

Focussed, purposeful adn refects insight
Organization

Poor

Has an organizational pattern, but may lack completeness or closure
Fair

Lacks logical progression of ideas
Good

Includes beginning, middle, and end, but these elements may be brief.
Above average

Transitional devices strengthen organization
Outstanding

Logical progression of ideas
Exceptional

Powerfully organized
Conventions

Poor

Frequent and blatant errors in basic conventions; commonly used words may be misspelled.
Fair

Errors in basic conventions, but common words are spelled correctly
Good

General conventions are used
Above average

Occasional errors: word choice is adequate
Outstanding

Sentence structure varied
Exceptional

Few errors, sentence structure varied
Understanding

Poor

Obvious misunderstanding
Fair

Definite misunderstanding
Good

Partial/limited understanding
Above average

Commonplace understanding
Outstanding

Mature understanding
Exceptional

Superior understanding
Support

Poor

Little, if any, development of the supporting ideas; support may consist of generalizations or fragmentary lists
Fair

Development of support is erratic and nonspecific
Good

Development of support is uneven
Above average

Lacks specificity and support is loosely developed
Outstanding

Specific details
Exceptional

Superior understanding
References and sources

Poor

No sources or support
Fair

Sources used, but not referenced
Good

All sources used are not referenced
Above average

Sources are reference, but some may not be properly done
Outstanding

All sources properly reference.
Exceptional
Scoring

Score = F+O+C+U+S+R/6
average pts/36 X 100

Poor
Fair
Good
Above average
Outstanding
Exceptional



Keywords:
  • Critical thinking case study

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58