iRubric: Article Analysis Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Article Analysis Presentation

Read current Environmental Science article from InfoTrac and present analysis to class using visual aids, graphics and/or support material

Rubric Code: D32676

By kathyf

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Article Analysis Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Subject Matter Knowledge Link between article and class content	Poor does not have grasp of information; cannot answer audience questions; no link between class content	Fair Is comfortable with information and can only answer basic questions	Good Is comfortable with information; states connection between class content and answers questions briefly	Excellent Full knowledge of information; states connection clearly and convincingly; able to elaborate easily and provide thorough answers to questions
Structure Clarity of Summary of Article	Poor Difficult to follow; no obvious sequence of information	Fair Difficult to follow as skips around topic; loses thread	Good Information presented logically; easy to follow	Excellent Information presented logically; easy to follow; effectively engaging entire class with article information
Verbal Communication	Poor Mumbles; uses jargon when speaking; difficult to hear; hesitates	Fair Difficult to hear some of the time; only some jargon used	Good Most of the audience can hear and understand	Excellent Can be clearly heard and understood by all audience
Non Verbal Communication	Poor Minimal eye contact; reading from notes/visual aid; audience not engaged at all	Fair Eye contact some of the time/some of the audience; turns back; reads notes	Good Audience engaged but not fully relaxed or absorbed	Excellent Good rapport, including all audience; eye contact; welcoming questions
Use of Visual Aids PowerPoint, iPod, Graphics, Support Material	Poor No supporting visual aids, graphics, or support material to increase audience understanding	Fair Visual aids, graphics or support material do not increase audience understanding	Good Relevant and timely use of visual aids, graphics and support material increasing audience understanding	Excellent Confident use of quality visual aids, graphics and support material, furthering audience understanding
Accuracy	Poor Multiple mistakes, such as misspellings, incorrect explanation, misuse of terminology	Fair 3 mistakes, such as misspelling, incorrect explanation, misuse of terminology	Good No obvious mistakes	Excellent Potential audience misunderstandings clarified or explained up front

Keywords:

environmental science, article summary, verbal communication, subject matter knowledge, accuracy

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric