iRubric: Oak Hill Middle School Strategic Plan rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Oak Hill Middle School Strategic Plan

Five-year Strategic Plan

Rubric for assessment of School Strategic Plan

Rubric Code: D2XX6X9

By gparadise

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: 6-8, Graduate

Oak Hill Middle School Strategic Plan
	Mastery 5 pts	Distinguished 3 pts	Merging 1 pts
Key Strategic Improvements	Mastery Identifies an aspect that needs long-term improvement The aspect impacts multiple other areas of the library Clearly defines the aspect and how it relates to other areas of the library Clearly defines and delineates the needed improvement and how improvement will impact the related areas	Distinguished Identifies an obvious aspect that needs long-term improvement Clearly defines the aspect Clearly defines and delineates the needed improvement Relates the aspect few or no other areas of the library	Merging Identifies an obvious aspect that needs short-term improvement Vaguely defines the aspect Incompletely defines and delineates the needed improvement Does not relate the aspect to other areas of the library
Vision and Mission statement	Mastery Vision statement is short statement of values and hopes currently and in the future. Mission statement is a concise declaration of the purpose of the library	Distinguished Vision statement is statement of current values and hopes, but lacks long-term value Mission statement is a description of current purpose, but is wordy and either overly broad or too specific	Merging Vision and mission statement are misidentified Statements are vague Statements lack necessary specificity, but may also be unnecessarily wordy
Strategic Plan Goals	Mastery Desired outcomes are clearly identified Outcomes relate to the aspect being improved and to the related areas Goals encompass the vision of the library	Distinguished Desired outcomes are clearly identified Outcomes relate to the aspect being improved Goals relate to the specific aspect being improved	Merging Outcomes are not clearly identified Outcomes do not relate to the aspect being improved Goals may have been confused with objectives
Strategic Plan Objectives	Mastery Number of objectives per goal varies with the goal Each objective is designed to implement at least one goal Each objective clearly defines how it will be done, who will do it, and when and under what conditions Objectives are measurable Methods of measurement are clearly defined Multiple methods of measurement are employed	Distinguished One objective per goal Each objective is designed to implement only one goal Each objective defines how it will be done, who will do it, and when and under what conditions Objectives are measurable Methods of measurement are clearly defined Only one or a few methods of measurement are employed	Merging Less than one objective per goal Objectives may not relate to any goals Objectives are poorly defined Objectives are not measurable Methods of measurement are inappropriate or unusable
Strategic Plan Evaluation	Mastery Number of evaluation per objective varies with the objective Each evaluation relates directly to at least one objective Each evaluation is directly measurable Methods of measurement for each evaluation are clearly defined Multiple methods of measurement are employed	Distinguished One evaluation per objective Each evaluation relates directly to one objective Each evaluation is directly measurable Methods of measurement are clearly defined Only one or a few methods of measurement are employed	Merging Less than one evaluation per objective Evaluations may not relate directly to any objectives Evaluations are poorly defined Evaluations are not measurable Methods of measurement are inappropriate or unusable
Strategic Plan Indicators	Mastery Number and type of indicators are appropriate to activities and objectives Indicators are clearly defined, valid and reliable Methods of measurement for each indicator are defined adn appropriate to the indicator Multiple methods of measurement are employed	Distinguished Number and type of indicators are adequate to activities and objectives Indicators are clearly defined, valid and reliable Methods of measurement for each indicator are defined Only one or a few methods of measurement are employed	Merging Number and type of indicators are inadequate to activities and objectives Indicators are vaguely defined and are neither valid nor reliable Methods of measurement for are inappropriate or unusable

Subjects:

Education

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric