Skip to main content
iRubric: Web Site Design with CSS rubric

iRubric: Web Site Design with CSS rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Web Site Design with CSS 
Rubric Code: D23477X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Computers  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric CSS Interest Site Project
  Excellent

20 pts

Good

15 pts

Fair

10 pts

Poor

1 pts

Coding Validation
20 %

Excellent

There are no errors in the XHTML, CSS or other coding on the site as found by me or an online validator.
Good

There are 1-3 coding errors on the site as found by me or an online validator.
Fair

There are 4-5 coding errors on the site as found by me or an online validator.
Poor

There are more than 6 coding errors on the site as found by me or an online validator.
Layout/Design
20 %

Excellent

The web site has an exceptionally attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements. White space, graphic elements and/or alignment are used effectively to organize material.
Good

The web site has an attractive and usable layout. It is easy to locate all important elements.
Fair

The web site has a usable layout, but may appear busy or boring. It is easy to locate most of the important elements.
Poor

The web site has a cluttered look and is confusing. It is often difficult to locate important elements.
Cascading Style Sheet
10 %

Excellent

Student uses a style sheet to define attributes (along with some inline style), which makes all pages attractive looking and consistent.
Good

Student uses a style sheet, however there is some inconsistencies in relation to the styles on each page in the web site.
Fair

Student uses a style sheet, however, it is not consistent on all pages, which disrupts consistency of pages within the web site.
Poor

Student fails to use a style sheet within the pages of the web site.
Navigation
10 %

Excellent

Lilnks for navigation are clearly labeled, consistently placed, allow the reader to easily move from a page to related pages and take reader where he expects to go. A user does not become lost.
Good

Links for navigation are clearly labeled, allow the reader to easily move from page to page and internal links take the reader where he expects to go. A user rarely becomes lost.
Fair

Links for navigation ake the reader where expected, but some needed links seem to be missing. A user sometimes gets lost.
Poor

Some links do not take the reader to the sites/pages described. A user typically feels lost.
Graphics
10 %

Excellent

Graphics are related to the theme or purpose of the site, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Good

Graphics are related to the theme or purpose of the site, are of good quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Fair

Graphics are of fair design, unoriginal, with elements that need enhancing such as red eye, etc.
Poor

Graphics are poor design, unoriginal or borrowed work that need major enhancements such as red eye, improved cropping, etc.
Writing Mechanics
10 %

Excellent

Site has been fully edited to be
free of errors in grammar, usage
and mechanics
Writing style is deeply engaging
Good

Few errors in grammar, usage,
spelling or punctuation give clear
evidence of careful editing
Writing style is interesting and
effective
Fair

Some editing for spelling and
punctuation is required
Writing style is appropriate for
the purpose
Poor

Errors in grammar and usage
interfere with meaning
Many punctuation and spelling
errors
Writing style is not effective for
the purpose
Site requires extensive editing
Errors in grammar and usage
are noticeable, but do not
interfere with meaning
Target and Purpose
10 %

Excellent

Very strong understanding of
who the site was created for.
All elements of the site are
engaging and appropriate for the
target audience.
Good

Site has a clear purpose
Major elements of the site are
appropriate for the target
audience
Fair

Purpose may be somewhat
unclear
Target audience is identified,
and some choices are
appropriate for this audience
Poor

Site lacks a sense of purpose.
No indication that the site was
created for a target audience
other than teacher-as-grader
Crediting Sources
10 %

Excellent

Sources of information are
credited in standard formats.
All permissions are secured and
organized for future reference
Good

Sources of information are
credited in standard formats.
All permissions are secured
Fair

Sources of information are
acknowledged
Most permissions have been
secured
Poor

No reference of original sources
Information is copied without
permission




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16