iRubric: PM420 Church Planting Final Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

PM420 Church Planting Final Project

The final project of this class is a “senior thesis”, in which the student will address the application of their ENTIRE time at IBC and future ministry.

Rubric Code: CX289XW

By knewman_ibc

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Vocational

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Final Project Enter rubric description
	Superior (A+ - A-) 100 pts	Above Average (B+ - B-) 89 pts	Average (C+ - C-) 79 pts
Introduction 10 pts Sets the stage for the Project	Superior (A+ - A-) Meets page requirement (1) Captures the reader's attention Summarizes the project Clear thesis	Above Average (B+ - B-) Meets or almost meets the page requirement(1) Interesting Somewhat summarizes the paper Thesis is stated, but not clear	Average (C+ - C-) Does not meet page requirement (1) Not interesting Basically summarizes the paper No or unclear thesis
Ministry Preparation 20 pts •Overview of time at IBC; the great lessons learned and character formed, both from internships, classroom learning, discipleship experiences, etc	Superior (A+ - A-) Meets or exceeds page requirement (3-4) Gives good overview of time at IBC Details a number lessons learned, and how character was developed Explains experiences *Open and honest	Above Average (B+ - B-) Meets page requirement (3-4) Gives a general overview of time at IBC Gives some lessons learned, but not specific or detailed Gives some experiences, but doesn't explain them	Average (C+ - C-) Does not meet page requirement (3-4) Gives a basic overview of time at IBC Gives lessons, but no details or specifics Does not give many experiences or fails to explain them
Readiness for Ministry 20 pts •Personal readiness (strengths and weaknesses) •Impact of marital/ family status upon ministry •Call (SHAPE)	Superior (A+ - A-) Meets or exceeds page requirement (3-4) Is honest and forthcoming in strengths and weaknesses Details family and marital status impact Understands calling and SHAPE	Above Average (B+ - B-) Meets page requirement (3-4) Gives some strengths and weaknesses, but not completely open Gives some thought to family and marital impact Somewhat understands their calling and SHAPE	Average (C+ - C-) Does not meet the page requirement (3-4) Gives no detail in strengths and weaknesses Barely covers impact of family and marriage Does not fully understand calling or SHAPE
Future Approach to Ministry 40 pts •Core Values •Support structures for future ministry •Philosophy of ministry	Superior (A+ - A-) Meets or exceeds page requirement (8-12) Understand and applies Core Values Thought out Philosophy for Ministry Given much thought to future ministry	Above Average (B+ - B-) Meets page requirement (8-12) Comprehends Core Values, but does not apply Somewhat thought out Philosophy of Ministry Given some thought to future ministry	Average (C+ - C-) Does not meet page requirement (8-12) Does not fully understand or apply Core Values Philosophy of Ministry is not well thought out Given little real thought to future ministry
Format 10 pts Proper formatting Use of Scripture Use of 1st person Properly documented	Superior (A+ - A-) Paper is formatted properly (font, spacing, required pages) Uses copious amounts of Scripture Uses first person properly All sources are documented properly *Little to no spelling or grammatical mistakes	Above Average (B+ - B-) Most of the paper is formatted properly Uses a good amount of Scripture Uses first person Mostly documented properly *Some spelling and grammatical errors	Average (C+ - C-) Paper is not formatted properly Uses little Scripture Doesn't use first person Most sources are not documented properly Many spelling and grammatical mistakes

Subjects:

Vocational

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric

Final Project Enter rubric description
	Superior (A+ - A-) 100 pts	Above Average (B+ - B-) 89 pts	Average (C+ - C-) 79 pts
Introduction 10 pts Sets the stage for the Project	Superior (A+ - A-) Meets page requirement (1) Captures the reader's attention Summarizes the project Clear thesis	Above Average (B+ - B-) Meets or almost meets the page requirement(1) Interesting Somewhat summarizes the paper Thesis is stated, but not clear	Average (C+ - C-) Does not meet page requirement (1) Not interesting Basically summarizes the paper No or unclear thesis
Ministry Preparation 20 pts •Overview of time at IBC; the great lessons learned and character formed, both from internships, classroom learning, discipleship experiences, etc	Superior (A+ - A-) Meets or exceeds page requirement (3-4) Gives good overview of time at IBC Details a number lessons learned, and how character was developed Explains experiences *Open and honest	Above Average (B+ - B-) Meets page requirement (3-4) Gives a general overview of time at IBC Gives some lessons learned, but not specific or detailed Gives some experiences, but doesn't explain them	Average (C+ - C-) Does not meet page requirement (3-4) Gives a basic overview of time at IBC Gives lessons, but no details or specifics Does not give many experiences or fails to explain them
Readiness for Ministry 20 pts •Personal readiness (strengths and weaknesses) •Impact of marital/ family status upon ministry •Call (SHAPE)	Superior (A+ - A-) Meets or exceeds page requirement (3-4) Is honest and forthcoming in strengths and weaknesses Details family and marital status impact Understands calling and SHAPE	Above Average (B+ - B-) Meets page requirement (3-4) Gives some strengths and weaknesses, but not completely open Gives some thought to family and marital impact Somewhat understands their calling and SHAPE	Average (C+ - C-) Does not meet the page requirement (3-4) Gives no detail in strengths and weaknesses Barely covers impact of family and marriage Does not fully understand calling or SHAPE
Future Approach to Ministry 40 pts •Core Values •Support structures for future ministry •Philosophy of ministry	Superior (A+ - A-) Meets or exceeds page requirement (8-12) Understand and applies Core Values Thought out Philosophy for Ministry Given much thought to future ministry	Above Average (B+ - B-) Meets page requirement (8-12) Comprehends Core Values, but does not apply Somewhat thought out Philosophy of Ministry Given some thought to future ministry	Average (C+ - C-) Does not meet page requirement (8-12) Does not fully understand or apply Core Values Philosophy of Ministry is not well thought out Given little real thought to future ministry
Format 10 pts Proper formatting Use of Scripture Use of 1st person Properly documented	Superior (A+ - A-) Paper is formatted properly (font, spacing, required pages) Uses copious amounts of Scripture Uses first person properly All sources are documented properly *Little to no spelling or grammatical mistakes	Above Average (B+ - B-) Most of the paper is formatted properly Uses a good amount of Scripture Uses first person Mostly documented properly *Some spelling and grammatical errors	Average (C+ - C-) Paper is not formatted properly Uses little Scripture Doesn't use first person Most sources are not documented properly Many spelling and grammatical mistakes