Skip to main content
iRubric: Elearning Evaluation (Networks) rubric

iRubric: Elearning Evaluation (Networks) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Elearning Evaluation (Networks) 
Elearning Evaluation (Networks)
This rubic is used to evaluate Elearning courses online.
Rubric Code: CBCWXX
By sclemente
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Instructional Design
Enter rubric description
 

Poor

1 pts


Fair

2 pts


Good

3 pts


Exellent

4 pts

Enter Title

N/A Not Applicable (NA)

(N/A)

Instructional Design

Objectives of this course
1

Not Clearly stated or were inaccurate, unrelated to course content.
2

Somewhat clearly stated and were somewhat accurate
3

Clearly stated and accurate with relevancy to the course content
4

Clearly stated, accurate, and clear.
Enter Title
Instructional Design

Course outline.
1

Did not receive a course outline for the course or it was not complete or included
2

Somewhat informative course outline was received. Some information was lacking
3

Clear course outline which included instructor's information, course information and no errors.
4

Clear course outline which included instructors information, detailed course information, and no errors.
Enter Title
Instructional Design

Technology tools used in the course
1

No additional multimedia or other technology tools were used to facilitate Elearning
2

Limited use of multimedia or other technology tools were used to facilitate learning.
3

Adequate use of multimedia or other technology tools were used to facilitate learning.
4

Variety of multimedia or other technology tools were used to facilitate learning throughtout the course.
Enter Title
Instrucational Design

Resources used in this course
1

Provided no additional learning resources or references to enhance student learning in this course
2

Provided limited learning resources or references to the student.
3

Provided adequate learning resources or references to the student.
4

Provided significant learning resources to enhance student learning in this course.
Enter Title
Presentation Design
This section will help you determine the effectiveness of the presentation design.
Presentation Design

Organization of the course.
1

Course has not yet been fully designed, a number of areas take the student to dead links.
2

Somewhat organizes into appropriate units and lessons, limited information relative to the unit.
3

Adequate organization of units with a clear description of the objectives, activities, and resources.
4

Highly organized units with clear descriptions, activities, and resources that frame each unit.
Enter Title
Presentation Design

Asthetic design
1

Does not present and communicate course information clearly or in a visually pleasing fashion
2

Vaguely presents and communicates course information in a visually pleasing fashion.
3

Adequately presents and communicates course information clearly and presents information in a visually pleasing fashion.
4

Throughly communicates course information and clearly presents information in a pleasing fashion.
Enter Title
Presentation Design

Structure of the course units.
1

Not Clearly organzied, no overview of the material provided.
2

somewhat organized into appropriate units and lessons.
3

Adequate organization of units.
4

Highly organized units with clear descriptions on the objectives, and activities.
Enter Title
Interaction Design
This section will help you detemine the effectiveness of the interaction design.
Interaction Design

Instructor-student interaction
1

no direct contact between the instructor and student
2

limited contact between the instructor and student.
3

Adequate contact between instructor and student
4

Significant contact between instructor and student.
Enter Title
Interaction Design

Feedback on student proformance.
1

No feedback was provided
2

Infrequent and sporadic feedback was provided.
3

Regular feedback about student proformance was provided.
4

Regular feedback about student performance was provided.
Enter Title
Interaction Design

Communication
1

Course included a limited amout of methods
2

Course included an fair amount.
3

Course included average amount
4

Course included a large amount od methods to communicate.
Enter Title




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98