Skip to main content
iRubric: Reconstruction to Reform Holistic Study rubric

iRubric: Reconstruction to Reform Holistic Study rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Reconstruction to Reform Holistic Study 
A Holistic Study of Reconstruction, The Gilded Age, the Expansion of the West, and the Progressive Movement
Rubric Code: C93234
By gworley
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Holistic Study
  Poor

Student is lacking

10 pts

Fair

Student performs below standard

15 pts

Good

Student meets the standard

17 pts

Excellent

Student performs above average

20 pts

Content

Presenter must define their topic and the economic, social, and political impacts on the respective time period.
Poor

Student does not incorporate and/or explain the economic, political, and cultural implications of their topic. Demonstrates a shallow understanding of the topic and cannot answer even basic peer questions.
Fair

Student somewhat incorporates and/or vaguely explains the economic, political, and cultural implications of their topic. Demonstrates a general understanding of the topic, but struggles to answer peer questions.
Good

Student incorporates and explains the economic, political, and cultural implications of their topic. Demonstrates a general understanding of the topic and can answer peer questions.
Excellent

Student incorporates and explains the economic, political, and cultural implications of their topic. Demonstrates a thorough understanding of the topic and can easily answer peer questions.
Incorporation of Primary Sources

Must incorporate excerpted information from the primary sources cited.
Poor

Student demonstrates little understanding of most primary sources and incorporates excerpted information within the presentation. Student cannot explain the gist, analysis, and point of view of each primary source.
Fair

Student demonstrates a shallow understanding of most primary sources and incorporates excerpted information within the presentation. Student struggles to articulate the gist, analysis, and point of view of each primary source.
Good

Student demonstrates a general understanding of most primary sources and incorporates excerpted information within the presentation. Student can generally explain the gist, analysis, and point of view of each primary source.
Excellent

Student demonstrates deep understanding of all primary sources and incorporates excerpted information within the presentation. Student can articulate the gist, analysis, and point of view of each primary source.
Works Cited

Students must incorporate at least 5 primary sources and 2 secondary sources in their research.
Poor

Student has submitted Works Cited page, which includes 2 secondary and 5 primary sources, on time, but includes up to 7-10 errors in format.
Fair

Student has submitted Works Cited page, which includes 2 secondary and 5 primary sources, on time, but includes up to 3-5 errors in format.
Good

Student has submitted an appropriately formatted Works Cited page, which includes 2 secondary and 5 primary sources, on time but includes 1 or 2 errors in format..
Excellent

Student has submitted an appropriately formatted Works Cited page, which includes 2 secondary and 5 primary sources, on time with no errors in format.
Presentation/Product

The format of the product.
Poor

The format of the presentation does not compliment the topic presented. Student does not seem prepared. Presenter is unprofessional.
Fair

The audience is left confused about the relationship between the topic and the format presented. The student is somewhat prepared, but struggles to appropriately execute the original proposal. Presenter is unprofessional at times.
Good

The format of the presentation compliments the topic presented. Student is prepared. It is delivered in a professional manner.
Excellent

The format of the presentation is particularly engaging- clarifies and enlightens audience about the topic presented. The student is over prepared (predicted questions, prepared accompanying resources, etc.). It is delivered in a professional manner.
Teacher Evaluation

Consideration of peer evaluations and general teaching style
Poor

Teacher considers that the class (RUSH) average scored the presenter 10, 11, 12, 13, or 14 peer evaluation points. Student did not engage with the class. Limited knowledge during Q&A.
Fair

Teacher considers that the class (RUSH) average scored the presenter 15 or 16 peer evaluation points. Student attempted to engage with class. Shallow knowledge during Q & A.
Good

Teacher considers that the class (RUSH) average scored the presenter 17, 18, or 19 peer evaluation points. Student engaged with class. General knowledge during Q & A.
Excellent

Teacher considers that the class (RUSH) average scored the presenter 20 peer evaluation points. Class was immersed in presentation. Very knowledgeable during Q & A.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98