iRubric: Diagnostic Assessment -AP (Pre) rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Diagnostic Assessment -AP (Pre)

A rubric that properly evaluates the artistic process. It measures the various phases and approaches that are necessary in the assessment of a project or a work of art.

Rubric Code: C8W2AX

By cmateyunas

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Arts and Design

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

AP 2D DESIGN Diagnostic Assessment
	EXTREMELY WELL QUALIFIED 5 pts	WELL QUALIFIED 4 pts	QUALIFIED 3 pts	POSSIBLY QUALIFIED 2 pts	NO RECOMMENDATION 1 pts
Design& Concepts Level of understanding about composition, elements and principles of design used in concentration section.	EXTREMELY WELL QUALIFIED -Demonstrates a strong grasp of the elements and principles of design, using them to express a visual idea;	WELL QUALIFIED -Demonstrates a good understanding of the elements and principles of design -Has some sense of purpose or direction, but it may not be fully resolved.	QUALIFIED -Shows an emerging understanding of the elements and principles of design.	POSSIBLY QUALIFIED -Shows little understanding of elements and principles of design;	NO RECOMMENDATION -Shows no apparent understanding of the principles of design
Craftsmanship/ Skill The control, selection and experimentation of a medium/media.	EXTREMELY WELL QUALIFIED -Successfully engages with most aspects of technique and materials.	WELL QUALIFIED -Shows a sense of technical competence, has some sense of purpose or direction, but it may not be fully resolved.	QUALIFIED -More accomplished technically than it is conceptually; -Might not show the technical skills needed to resolve the ideas it addresses;	POSSIBLY QUALIFIED -Shows limited artistic decision-making. -Employs simplistic solutions to design problems;	NO RECOMMENDATION -Reveals a lack of understanding of technique; -Shows a lack of awareness of tools/media; -Uses trite solutions to visual problems.
Creativity Inventiveness, expression of ideas and imagination portrayed in the construction of project.	EXTREMELY WELL QUALIFIED -Shows evidence of thinking; i.e., it conveys a sense that it is about something.	WELL QUALIFIED -Has some technical aspects that are handled well or some ideas that are handled well, but the two do not always mesh or work together.	QUALIFIED -Shows some ambition while achieving only moderate success.	POSSIBLY QUALIFIED -Has little sense of exploration.	NO RECOMMENDATION -Shows little evidence of thinking/artistic decision-making.
Originality Work ethic; the time dedicated to the project inside and/or out of class.	EXTREMELY WELL QUALIFIED -Any apparent use of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists shows a strong sense of the student’s individual transformation of the images.	WELL QUALIFIED -If there is apparent use of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists, the student’s individual “voice” can be discerned.	QUALIFIED -If published photographic sources or the work of other artists are used, the work appears to be a nearly direct reproduction; the student’s “voice” is minimal.	POSSIBLY QUALIFIED -The works are copies of published or photographic sources or the work of other artists; there is little discernible student “voice.”	NO RECOMMENDATION -The works are obviously direct copies of photographic sources or the work of other artists; there is no discernible student “voice.”
Artist Statement Ability to express visual ideas and concepts through text	EXTREMELY WELL QUALIFIED -Statement is clear and simply stated.	WELL QUALIFIED -Statement is mostly clear.	QUALIFIED -Statement is vague and unclear.	POSSIBLY QUALIFIED -Statement is vague and confusing	NO RECOMMENDATION -Statement is confusing and unclear and does not relate to portfolio.

Keywords:

Art work, art project, art assessment

Subjects:

Arts and Design

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric