iRubric: Security Website Evaluation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Security Website Evaluation

Rubric used to evaluate websites created to document adminstrative procedures used to provide security and fault tolerance on a Windows Server 2008 network for the ITN 113 Active Directory class.

Rubric Code: C7W532

By ameeth

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Computers

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Security Website Evaluation Rubric used to evaluate websites created to document adminstrative procedures used to provide security and fault tolerance on a Windows Server 2008 network.
	Poor 0-2 points 0 pts	Good 3-7 points 5 pts	Excellent 8-10 points 10 pts
Timeliness Meets deadlines	Poor Failed to submit both drafts by the deadline and send email that site was completed by the deadline.	Good Met one of the draft deadlines and sent final email.	Excellent Met both draft deadlines and sent the final email by the deadline.
Clarity Well-written procedures	Poor Procedures are poorly written. Include grammar and spelling errors. Sequential steps are not shown as a numbered list.	Good Procedures are generally well written. Some spelling and grammar errors. Uses bulleted lists or paragraphs where numbered list are more appropriate.	Excellent Procedures are well written and free of spelling/grammar errors. Sequential steps use numbered lists.
Thoroughness Number of procedures	Poor Only includes a few procedures. Does not thoroughly address the security and fault tolerance topics demonstrated during the semester.	Good Includes some procedures for securing the network and providing fault tolerance. Leaves out many important procedures.	Excellent Includes a full array of security and fault tolerance procedures as demonstrated this semester. Also, includes a few procedures beyond what was covered in the course.
Visuals Includes screenshots	Poor Site is all text based. Does not capture screenshots to visualize critical steps. Does not emphasize keywords in text.	Good Includes too few or two many screenshots. Does not annotate screens to point to buttons in the step. Does not consistently emphasize keywords in text.	Excellent Includes effective screenshots to visualize key steps. Annotates screens to highlight features referenced in the written procedure. Emphasizes keywords in text using bold, italics, color, or other type of emphasis.
Organization Site is easy to navigate and procedures can be located easilty.	Poor Lists all procedures alphabetically. Does not organize into groups using subpages. Navigating site is difficult.	Good Navigating site is fairly easy but grouping procedures into categories would have been more effective.	Excellent Navigation of the site and searching for a particular procedure is user friendly. Procedures are grouped into logical units to facilitate organization of the site.