Skip to main content

iRubric: Managerial Accounting - Group Project Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Managerial Accounting - Group Project Rubric 
This rubric defines the criteria on which your group project will be evaluated. As you prepare your project, keep these requirements in mind to assure your group's maximum performance. Please note that the requirements for this assignment are divided into two major headings, Analytical Performance and Presentation. The maximum score for each of your cases is 100 points.
Rubric Code: C37C78
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Accounting  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Managerial Acctg - Group Project
  Poor

50 pts

Acceptable

80 pts

Excellent

100 pts

Analytical Performance
Problem Definition

Poor

Students fail to correctly discern the problem presented by the assigned case. 5 Points
Acceptable

Students correctly discern the problem presented by the assigned case. 12 Points
Excellent

Students correctly discern the problem presented by the assigned case and consider other business issues that might be related. 15 Points
Approach to Problem Resolution

Poor

Students can not form a solution approach to the case problem utilizing relevant theory without instructor intervention. 5 Points
Acceptable

Students focus their energy on a single approach to solving the case problem. The approach is theoretically relevant and produces a solution that will provide a profitable solution. 8 Points
Excellent

Students consider a range of relevant theoretical approaches to solving the case problem. They select the approach most likely to produce a solution that optimizes profitability. 10 Points
Theoretical Application

Poor

Students require considerable assistance from the instructor to apply the relevant theory to solving the problem 10 Points
Acceptable

Students properly apply the relevant theory in arriving at the problem solution. 16 Points
Excellent

Students properly apply the relevant theory in arriving at the problem solution. They consider the multiple solutions that may result from the application of a single relevant theory. 20 Points
Underlying Schedules

Poor

Students supply schedules that are neither technically correct, relevant to the problem solution, nor complete. 10 Points
Acceptable

With the assistance of the instructor, students supply schedules that are technically correct, relevant to the problem solution, and complete. 16 Points
Excellent

Students supply schedules that are technically correct, relevant to the problem solution, and complete. 20 Points
Problem Solution

Poor

Students offer a solution to the case problem, but the connection between theory, logic and calculation is not strong. The solution may not make business sense since it does not logically follow from the expected application of sound theory and practice. 5 Points
Acceptable

Students offer a solution to the case problem that is theoretically supported, properly calculated, and logically supported. 12 Points
Excellent

Students offer a solution to the case problem that is theoretically supported, properly calculated, and logically supported. The students considered the offered solution and any other alternates that arose from their analysis. 15 Points
Presentation
PowerPoint Presentation

Poor

The presentation is not connected to the 5 process points discussed in the analytical performance section above. The presentation may not be logical or easy to understand. 5 Points
Acceptable

The presentation includes most of the 5 process points discussed in the analytical performance section above. The presentation is mostly logical, and relatively easy to understand. 8 Points
Excellent

The presentation includes each of the 5 process points discussed in the analytical performance section above. The presentation is logical, comprehensive, easy to understand and attractive to view. 10 Points
Oral Presentation

Poor

Only some team members participate in the oral presentation. Members are not well prepared, flustered and lack confidence. 5 Points
Acceptable

All members of the team participate in the oral presentation. Team members are generally well prepared, confident, and composed. 8 Points
Excellent

All members of the team participate in the oral presentation. Team members are technically well prepared, confident, and composed. They handle questions and objectives deftly. 10 Points




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243