iRubric: EDU 635 Theory and Practice in Supervision rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

EDU 635 Theory and Practice in Supervision

The student will develop a model performance review instrument unique to their beliefs and leadership style. The student will present the professional performance review instrument in class. Assignment should be 7-10 pages not including instrument

Rubric Code: C34A97

By wgokey

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Assignment
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Grammar	Poor Numerous grammatical and mechanical errors	Fair Some grammatical errors and/or format that do not interfere with clarity.	Good Few grammatical or mechanical errors	Excellent Error free that reflects clear understanding and thorough proofreading.
Organization of Paper	Poor Weak organization	Fair Somewhat unfocused and unclear	Good Logical and sequential organization of ideas	Excellent Careful and relavant organization of ideas.
Leadership Style	Poor Leadership style of the individual as it relates to the performance review instrument is unclear	Fair There is an attempt to relate the individual's leadership style to the performance review instrument, but it isn unfocused and unclear.	Good Leadership style is clearly stated and is reflected in parts, but not all, of the performance review instrument.	Excellent Establishes and maintains a clear definition of leadership style and it is reflected throughout the performance review instrument.
Performance Criteria	Poor Performance review criteria are not clearly stated.	Fair Performance criteria are present, but not presented in a focused manner	Good Performance criteria are present, but they are not clearly related to the overall purpose of the instrument.	Excellent Performance criteri are clearly stated and their relationship to the overall purpose of the instrument maintained throughout.
Legal reference	Poor No attempt was made to use generally accepted legal principles in the construction of the performance review instrument.	Fair An attempt was made to apply generally legal principles to the performance review instrument, but this was not clearly evident or presented in a coherent manner.	Good Performance review instrument conforms with generally accepted legal principles in most, but not all, areas.	Excellent Performance review instrument is in compliance with generally accepted legal principles of employee evaluations.