Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: CC rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
CC
AP Spanish Language and Culture Presentational Speaking
Rubric Code:
C2447CW
By
jmanrique
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Cultural Comparison
Poor
1 pts
Weak
2 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
4 pts
Strong
5 pts
Treatment of Topic, Comparison of Cultures,Unders
Poor
Almost no treatment of topic within the context of the task
Presents information only about the student's own community or only about the target culture, and may not include examples
Demonstrates minimal understanding of the target culture; generally inaccurate
Weak
Unsuitable treatment of topic within the context of the task
Presents information only about the student's own community or only about the target culture, but may not compare them; consists mostly of statements with no development
Demonstrates a limited understanding of the target culture; may include several inaccuracies
Fair
Suitable treatment of topic within the context of the task
Presents information only about the student's own community or only about the target culture, including a few supporting details and examples
Demonstrates a basic understanding of the target culture, despite inaccuracies
Good
Generally effective treatment of topic within the context of the task
Compares the student's own community with the target culture, including some supporting details and mostly relevant examples
Demonstrates some understanding of the target culture, despite minor inaccuracies
Strong
Effective treatment of topic within the context of the task
Clearly compares the student's community with the target culture, including supporting details and relevant examples
Demonstrates understanding of the target culture, despite a few minor inaccuracies
Organization
Poor
Little or no organization; absence of transitional elements and cohesive devices
Weak
Limited organization; ineffective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Fair
Some organization; limited use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Good
Organized presentation; some effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Strong
Organized presentation; effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Comprehensibility, Vocabulary and idiomatic langua
Poor
Barely understandable, with frequent or significant errors that impede comprehensibility
Very few vocabulary resources
Weak
Partially understandable, with errors that force interpretation and cause confusion for the listener
Limited vocabulary and idiomatic language
Fair
Generally understandable, with errors that may impede comprehensibility
Appropriate but basic vocabulary and idiomatic language
Good
Fully understandable, with some errors which do not impede comprehensibility
Varied and generally appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language
Strong
Fully understandable, with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not impede comprehensibility
Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax, and usage, with few errors
Grammar, syntax, and usagea
Poor
Little or no control of grammar, syntax, and usage
Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually does not improve comprehensibility
Weak
Limited control of grammar, syntax, and usage
Clarification or self-correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility
Fair
Some control of grammar, syntax, and usage
Clarification or self-correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility
Good
General control of grammar, syntax, and usage
Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually improves comprehensibility
Strong
Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax, and usage, with few errors
Clarification or self-correction (if present) improves comprehensibility
Pronunciation, intonation, pacing
Poor
Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend; errors impede comprehensibility
Weak
Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend at times; errors impede comprehensibility
Fair
Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response generally comprehensible; errors occasionally impede comprehensibility
Good
Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response mostly comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility
Strong
Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility
Keywords:
AP, Presentational Speaking, Cultural Comparison
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.