Skip to main content
iRubric: Final Project - Theatre design - Director rubric

iRubric: Final Project - Theatre design - Director rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Final Project - Theatre design - Director 
Final Project - Theatre design - Director
Students read a chosen script. Working as a team, they determine an approach to the project and take on roles of Director, Producer, Lighting Designer, Set Designer or Costume Designer.
Rubric Code: C237643
By D_Matthews
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Director
Utilizing the given course script students are to develop a fully developed 3D model of the show based on their research/concept papers.
  Excellent

Above and beyond expectation.Obviously much work and effort was put into the product

25 pts

Good

A strong product. Great focus on detail.

20 pts

Fair

A basic understanding on both script and design needs.

15 pts

Needs Improvement

More attention needed on detail, design elements, and analysis.

10 pts

Poor

Minimal focus on design and detail.

5 pts

Presentation

Is the speaker confident in their information? Are they making eye contact, speaking clearly, engaging the audience' s attention?
Excellent

The speaker is well prepared, knows their subject thoroughly and has obviously put time and effort into the presentation.
Good

The speaker is prepared, exhibits knowledge and speaks with confidence.
Fair

The speaker is competant, speaks audibly and appears to know what they are talking about.
Needs Improvement

The speaker is hard to hear at times, eye contact is infrequent and is not totally knowledgeable about their presentation
Poor

The speaker is not audible, doesn't make eye contact, is fidgity, and has little or no knowlege of their subject.
Demands of Script

Evidence of research and analysis being put into action through design. Do the designs meet the needs and given circumstances of the script.
Excellent

The director gives a complete summary of the play. The design concept makes sense with the time/place/style of the script.
Good

The director gives a complete summary of the play.The design concept shows a clear effort to meet the time/place/style of the script.
Fair

The director gives a summary of the play. The design concept address the basic needs of the script.
Needs Improvement

The director tries to give a summary of the play.The designconcept ignores significant script demands.
Poor

The director does not give a summary of the play.The design concept does not represent the chosen play in any way.
Presentation - Ground Plan

Is the design clean and crisp. Is it presentation ready? Has effort been made to create a clean product?
Excellent

The ground plan is clean and attractive. It is obvious that time and effort have been spent creating them.
Good

The ground plan is neat, and there has been time spent creating them.
Fair

The ground plan was created with little effort. It is not neat.
Needs Improvement

The ground plan was created without much effort. It is not neat. T
Poor

The ground plan was obviously created at the last minute. It is not neat.
Costume & Props

Has time period and movability been taken into consideration? How does that tie in with the set design.
Excellent

There is evidence that a great deal of thought has been incorporated into the design. The designer has a unique or thoughtful take on costume and props. .
Good

There is evidence that some thought has been incorporated into the design. The designer has attempted to look beyond the script demands.
Fair

There is indication that there was use of the script demands. There are a couple of ideas about costuming but no props.
Needs Improvement

There is not a tie in with the script demands. There is little thought about the costume or prop needs.
Poor

There is no indication that the demands of the script were considered or thought regarding costume and props
Producer Information

Is the producer informative and clear? Did they follow the prompt and include information?
Excellent

All elements are clean, neat, detailed, and it is evident that clear choices have been made. It appears as though student spent an exceptional amount of time getting the assignment "just right".
Good

Slides are created neatly with some focus on the detail and technique. Clear choice has been made, though not fully executed. One aspect is forgotten
Fair

There is evidence of a process. The slides are finished but do not demonstrate a strong focus on detail nor contain all of the information. It appears as though the student rushed to complete the assignment.
Needs Improvement

The poster slides appear disconnected from the Directors vision. Look as though student ran out of time to complete the assignment. Missing 3 or more aspects
Poor

The slides are only a rough draft or very sloppy. Did not find sources for funding nor did they establish audience connection.
Budget

Did you stay on budget? Did you spend to much? Did you waste money? Does your return match your borrowing
Excellent

Students were able to earn plenty of money as well as use it wisely. They did not go over budget but also do not have an extreme surplus. Everybody was paid fairly.
Good

Students were able to ascertain small portions of money but still enough to afford 80% of things wanted. They did not go over budget but may have had a bit of surplus.
Fair

Students went slightly over budget or had a wide range of surplus but were still able to produce a good production and everyone was paid semi fairly.
Needs Improvement

Students went far over budget or had lots of surplus. They also did not pay staff fairly.
Poor

Students strayed very far from budget and spent money incorrectly. Staff was not paid at all.



Keywords:
  • theatre; theatre arts; set design; model



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98