Skip to main content
iRubric: Multicultural Self-Assessment Assignment rubric

iRubric: Multicultural Self-Assessment Assignment rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Multicultural Self-Assessment Assignment 
Recognizing Burnout and Vicarious Trauma
Rubric Code: C229W35
By kfrantel
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Reflection  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Multicultural Self-Assessment Assignment
  Poor

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Excellent

The following represents the necessary components for full points in each category.

(N/A)

Exploration
25 %

Brief exploration of important aspects of upbringing including formative experiences. Should discuss aspects of cultural, personal, and familial experiences most significant in forming identity.
Poor

Writer does very little to describe current identities and how they were formed.
Good

Writer describes some aspects of upbringing that shaped current identities. This includes personal, cultural, and familial experiences that shaped the development of and understanding of identity. Only one dimension of identity OR too many dimensions are discussed to adequately give details.
Excellent

Writer describes important aspects of upbringing that shaped current identities. This includes personal, cultural, and familial experiences that shaped the development of and understanding of identity. Multiple dimensions of identity are discussed with description of identity development.
Reflection
25 %

Reflection on the ways that systems of oppression and privilege impact writer's life and personal identities.
Poor

Writer does not address the ways that systemic power (i.e., privilege, oppression) are experienced due to personal identities. There is no discussion of personal experience and/or systemic aspects of power.
Good

Writer addresses some loose connections to the ways that systemic power (i.e., privilege, oppression) are experienced due to personal identities. There is little discussion of personal experience and/or systemic aspects of power.
Excellent

Writer addresses the ways that systemic power (i.e., privilege, oppression) are experienced due to personal identities. This includes either personal anecdotes of experienced privilege/oppression and/or discussion of the ways these systems of power impact worldview.
Connection to Trauma Work
25 %

Discussion of the ways that personal experiences of privilege and oppression will impact writer's perception of trauma and trauma therapy.
Poor

Writer does not adequately discusses the ways that their own identities and associated privilege/oppression influence their perception of trauma. No discussion of how trauma viewed by writer. Writer does not discuss how personal experiences with privilege/oppression impact their perspective on trauma-related therapy.
Good

Writer minimally discusses the ways that their own identities and associated privilege/oppression influence their perception of trauma. Little to no discussion of how trauma is viewed by writer. Writer does not sufficiently discuss how personal experiences with privilege/oppression impact their perspective on trauma-related therapy.
Excellent

Writer discusses the ways that their own identities and associated privilege/oppression influence their perception of trauma. Inherent in this portion of the paper is a discussion of how trauma is viewed by the writer. Writer also discusses how personal experiences with privilege/oppression impact their perspective on trauma-related therapy.
Visual Representation
15 %

Writer uses an appendix to develop a table or visual representation of identity along the ADDRESSING dimensions.
Poor

Few or no aspects of the ADDRESSING model are included with writer's own identity and indication fo which identities give writer privilege. Visually represented in a table or other graphic is not easy to understand.
Good

Most aspects of the ADDRESSING model are included with writer's own identity and indication fo which identities give writer privilege. Visually represented in a table or other graphic that is generally easy to understand.
Excellent

All aspects of the ADDRESSING model are included with writer's own identity and indication fo which identities give writer privilege. Visually represented in a table or other graphic that is easy to understand.
Professional Presentation & Cohesiveness
10 %

Assignment is no more than 5 pages (not including appendix or cover page) double spaced, in Times New Roman Font. Attention to spelling and grammar is evident. Citations are included as appropriate and in APA formatting.
Poor

Paper does not sufficiently meet the formatting criteria, has APA and spelling/grammar issues, and/or lacks cohesion and readability.
Good

Paper meets most of the formatting criteria with some APA or spelling/grammar concerns. It is overall cohesive and covers questions appropriately.
Excellent

Paper meets the overall formatting criteria with the appropriate length, use of APA references (if necessary). Minimal or no spelling or grammar issues. It is cohesive and addresses all questions with sufficient depth and detail.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16