Skip to main content

iRubric: Journalism Article Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Journalism Article Rubric 
Journalism students will be able to write a thorough news article rough draft. Articles will demonstrate a clear understanding of the expected writing format for the school newspaper with all expected elements.
Rubric Code: BX28C2X
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Journalism  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Feature Article
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Needs Revision

3 pts

Needs Instruction

2 pts

Not Enough to Evaluate

1 pts

1. Research

Excellent

It is evident that the writer conducted research beyond his understanding of the topic being written about. Hyperlinks to the information included in the article.
Good

It is evident that the writer conducted research beyond his understanding of the topic being written about, but no hyperlinks were included.
Needs Revision

What research was conducted does not apply directly to the article or enhance the reader's knowledge on the topic.
Needs Instruction

No research was conducted.
Not Enough to Evaluate

Not enough to evaluate!
2. Quotes

Excellent

This article includes quotes from at least three students of different class levels. The quotes enhance the article for the reader.
Good

This article includes quotes from at least two sources on campus from the same grade level or from a faculty member. The quotes enhance the article for the reader.
Needs Revision

This article includes only a single quote from a single source. The quote enhances the article weakly.
Needs Instruction

This article does not include any quotes.
Not Enough to Evaluate

Not enough to evaluate!
3. Lead

Excellent

Lead introduces subject and immediately engages the reader's interest, impelling continued reading. An anecdote, quote, or facts are used to grab the reader's interest.
Good

Lead introduces topic and engages the reader's interest, encouraging continued reading.
Needs Revision

Lead introduces topic
Needs Instruction

Lead vaguely introduces topic.
Not Enough to Evaluate

Not enough to evaluate!
4. Body

Excellent

Topic and Subtopics are well developed through explanation, descriptive details, anecdotes, and direct quotations.
Good

Topic and Subtopics are adequately developed through explanation, descriptive details, anecdotes, and direct quotations.
Needs Revision

Topic and Subtopics are somewhat developed through two or three types of writing.
Needs Instruction

Topics and Subtopics need additional development due to the use of only one type of writing.
Not Enough to Evaluate

Not enough to evaluate!
5. Conclusion

Excellent

Ends with a clear, satisfying sense of closure.
Good

Ends with a sense of closure.
Needs Revision

Somewhat provides a sense of closure.
Needs Instruction

Has an inadequate sense of closure.
Not Enough to Evaluate

Not enough to evaluate!
6. Spelling and Grammar

Excellent

Text is free of errors in sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling.
Good

Text is relatively free of errors in sentence structure, punctuation, and spelling.
Needs Revision

Text contains surface errors that do not impede the reader's understanding.
Needs Instruction

Text contains surface errors that do impede the reader's understanding.
Not Enough to Evaluate

Not enough to evaluate!
For Final Draft
Title

Excellent

The article has a creative title that catches the reader's interest.
Good

The article has a somewhat creative title.
Needs Revision

The article has an uninteresting title.
Needs Instruction

The article is lacking a title.
Not Enough to Evaluate

Not enough to evaluate!
Sub-Heading/Deck

Excellent

Article includes a catchy sub-heading that summarizes the content and whets the reader's appetite to read on.
Good

Article includes a sub-heading that is not accurate in its description of the article or directing the reader.
Needs Revision

Article includes a poorly contrived, weak sub-heading.
Needs Instruction

No sub-heading included.
Not Enough to Evaluate

Not enough to evaluate!
Elements

Excellent

This article includes three original elements, like images, video clips, or tables that enhance the reading experience. One serves as the feature image.
Good

This article includes two original elements, like images, video clips, or tables that enhance the reading experience. One serves as the feature image.
Needs Revision

This article includes a single original photograph that also serves as the feature image.
Needs Instruction

This article includes no elements or an image that was taken from an outside source. Attribution was given to the creator of the image.
Not Enough to Evaluate

No original image. If one was taken from the internet, no credit was offered to its creator.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243