iRubric: Author Study Poster rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Author Study Poster

Basic 4 point rubric for an author study.

Rubric Code: BC6327

By PamScala

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12

Author Study
	Outstanding 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Author Content	Outstanding Includes sufficient information about the author presentented in a clear manner.	Good Includes adequate biography of author.	Fair Includes some details about the author.	Poor Includes very few details about the author.
Books and Awards	Outstanding Includes list of well known books and awards earned as well as pictures.	Good Includes small list of well known books and awards earned.	Fair Includes a partial list of books and awards earned.	Poor Does not include list of books and awards earned.
Organization	Outstanding The poster is neat and well organized. Everything is clear and the content is efficient. Each member spoke about a specific section of the poster.	Good Details are placed in a logical order but the way they are presented sometimes makes the writing less interesting. Members did not know the material well.	Fair Some details are not in a logical order and this distracts the reader. Only a few members spoke	Poor Many details are not in a logical or expected order. Writing is not organized. Barely any of the members spoke.
Layout	Outstanding Contains a picture of the author as well as many self drawn and printed pictures related to the author.	Good Mostly decorated but missing self drawn pictures.	Fair Not enough pictures.	Poor Barely anything but writing or only a couple pictures.
Presentation	Outstanding Each group member spoke about a section of the poster. Voice was very well projected and eye contact clear. Teamwork is very evident.	Good Generally loud voice with eye contact. Some members spoke but not all. Teamwork is thre but somewhat unclear.	Fair Very poor eye contact and poor voice projection. Teamwork is severely lacking.	Poor No eye contact and very quiet. Team members did not work together and there is no collaborative effort.