iRubric: Music Performance Evaluation rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Music Performance Evaluation

Based upon the OSAA/ABDA Band and Orchestra Evaluation, revised to meet the needs of the Astoria School District's teacher evaluation process.

Rubric Code: B9BBA9

By angela_calvin

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Music

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8, 9-12

Music Performance Evaluation Based upon the OSAA/ABDA Band and Orchestra Evaluation, revised to meet the needs of the Astoria School District's teacher evaluation process.
	Does Not Meet Standards 1 pts	Improvement Necessary 2 pts	Effective 3 pts	Highly Effective 4 pts
QUALITY OF SOUND 30 pts TONE INTONATION BLEND/BALANCE	Does Not Meet Standards Music has many errors. Poor sound. Needs more air, volume and consistency in tone	Improvement Necessary 50% Accurate. Several errors occur, including key signature There are many wrong notes. Sound is not developed. Keep working towards more volume and consistency in tone.	Effective 75% Accurate. Occasional note is missed, due to key signature, identification error or accidental. Basic Tonality can be heard. Tone is generally consistent. Continue to work on improving embouchure and use of air.	Highly Effective Excellent accuracy. No mistakes were made, therefore music was performed as written. Tone is excellent. Great use of embouchure control, air, volume and consistency in tone.
TECHNIQUE 30 pts RHYTHM & PRECISION ARTICULATION AND/OR BOWING FACILITY	Does Not Meet Standards No sense of pulse. Rhythms are incorrect. Tempo is too inconsistent to determine.	Improvement Necessary Inconsistent pulse. Most rhythms are incorrect. Played within 30 bpm of performance tempo.	Effective Basic sense of pulse. Some rhythms are incorrect. Played within 20 bpm of performance tempo.	Highly Effective Strong sense of pulse. All rhythms performed accurately. Played at performance tempo.
MUSICALITY 30 pts INTERPRETATION/STYLE PHRASING EXPRESSION SENSITIVITY DYNAMICS	Does Not Meet Standards No distinguishable difference between any of the dynamic and articulation markings.	Improvement Necessary A few of the dynamics and articulations are observed but most are missed or ignored. There is little distinguishable difference between different markings.	Effective Several of the dynamic markings and articulations are observed and there is occasional difference between markings.	Highly Effective All of the dynamic and articulation markings are observed and there is clear and distinguishable difference during all markings.
OTHER FACTORS 10 pts CHOICE OF MUSIC APPEARANCE	Does Not Meet Standards	Improvement Necessary	Effective	Highly Effective

Subjects:

Music

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric