Skip to main content
iRubric: Rhetorical Analysis Essay Rubric_TEST_CH

iRubric: Rhetorical Analysis Essay Rubric_TEST_CH

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rhetorical Analysis Essay Rubric_TEST_CH 
Rubric Code: B2WC4C8
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Rhetorical Analysis Essay
  Excellent/Good

3

(N/A)

Adequate

2

(N/A)

Does Not Meet Standards

1

(N/A)

Introduction

/3 points

Excellent/Good

Student does an exceptional job captivating reader's interest, establishing the rhetorical situation,identifying rhetorical devices and syntax. Student links all of these elements to the attitude of the speaker.
Adequate

Student catches readers interest, establishes the rhetorical situation of the artifact, prepares audience for the analysis, and provides an explanation of either syntax or devices or tone.
Does Not Meet Standards

Introduction does not meet the minimum requirements. Major lapses in the establishment of the rhetorical situation.
Thesis

/3 points

Excellent/Good

Thesis Statement: how the text exemplifies a message that reflects the attitude and strategy of the speaker and author. Thesis is clear and concise.
Adequate

Thesis Statement: how the text exemplifies a message that reflects the attitude and strategy of either the speaker or the author.
Does Not Meet Standards

Thesis statement is unclear or vague. There is an attempt to focus on how the text exemplifies a message but does not clearly answer the question.
Evaluate

/3

Excellent/Good

Student evaluates how each element requested and others (if they add) reveal the ATTITUDE of the speaker effectively and considers the effectiveness the aspect has on the strategy. Student supplies a sufficient amount of elaboration to thoroughly explain the effects of tone (diction) and devices.
Adequate

Student evaluates how each element is effective and considers the effect device on the ATTITUDE of the speaker. Student elaborates to explain the effect of the appeal. Minor lapses.
Does Not Meet Standards

Student exhibits a minimal attempt to evaluate how each appeal or device is effective but does not consider the effect the appeal has on the ATTITUDE of the speaker. Little to no elaboration is evident.
Specific Examples

/3

Excellent/Good

Student provides plenty of specific examples from the text for the analysis.
Adequate

Student provides specific examples of text but does not explain the role of devices/diction/syntax
Does Not Meet Standards

Student includes little to no specific examples of diction/syntax/tone. Support is general and vague.
Strategy and proof

/3

Excellent/Good

Clearly and compellingly explains the author's strategy and backs up position with valid proof.
Adequate

Minor lapses that does not provide valid proof. Identifies strategy.
Does Not Meet Standards

Does not supply proof and does not mention strategy.



Keywords:
  • R RAYMOND

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98