- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Clinical Lab Testing Learning Module Study rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Clinical Lab Testing Learning Module Study Clinical Lab Testing Learning Module Study To assess an 8 week module and be able to comprehend and revise said material in the module. Rubric Code: B2W99W6 By randolba Draft Public Rubric Subject: Health Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Graduate

Module Evaluation 1 How comprehensive is the module?
	Poor Did not meet any content goals or confusing 1 pts	Fair Met some of the content but not advancing in learning 2 pts	Good Criteria met but does not engage the student in the material enough 3 pts	Excellent Criteria met and student fully engaged in the module of the week 4 pts
Content Was fully immersive and introduced a new topic with ease	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent I thought that the material was a great start and was engaging for myself and maintained my interest
Learning Progression Progress of learning is comprehensive and develops	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent The powerpoint and the rest of the material was at a good depth and the material was cohesive and truly helped to understand clinical validity from a ground standpoint.
Engagement Module gives activities and helps to give the student the ability to advance in learning	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent The types of questions being asked helped to keep engagement and it sparked discussion about questions that one may have had
Relevancy Is the material up to date and most relevant to the knowledge already known	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent The material seemed to engage in the most recent technology of NGS
Organization Is the module organized and follow the learning progression	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent I thought that it flowed well, the only thing was the video seemed to be a little too long and only did I need the first 35 minutes where the rest transitioned over to another new topic.
Scientific Accuracy Is the data being presented correct/Are there any flaws	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent I did not find any flaws to the data and the sources for the powerpoint were credible.