iRubric: Evidence-Based Practice Report rubric

An introduction that outlines, the content, scope and organization of the review.

Correct format not followed; PICOT elements not clearly identified.

Abstract articulates some key components of the paper.

An introduction that describes the content, scope and organization of the review.

PICOT question format is not followed.

Abstract articulates the practice question but is missing

Introduction is well-articulated and provides a clear, logical description of content, scope and organization of literature review.

PICOT question is formatted correctly but lacks detail.

Abstract articulates the practice question, summarizes the methods and results, summarizes synthesis of literature review.

Introduction is well-articulated and provides a clear, logical and succinct description of content, scope and organization of literature review and draws the reader's attention to the central concern.

PICOT question is formatted correctly with detail.

Abstract articulates the practice question, summarizes the methods and results, summarizes synthesis of literature review and provides "best' answer to practice problem

Research articles were not synthesized and/or did not specifically relate to clinical problem.

Conclusion lacks organization and cohesion. No suggestions for improving practice.

Research articles are not presented and/or synthesized well. Articles do not completely relate to discussion

Conclusion is present but is confusing and there are limited or no suggestions for improving practice.

Research articles are presented but lack organization to synthesize the information well.

Conclusion is clear, but there are limited or no suggestions for improving practice.

Research articles are discussed in cohesive manner, and well organized to present the findings supporting the discussion.

Conclusion is clear and concise. Suggestion for improving practice and relevance to nursing are included.