iRubric: NJ Olympians and Math rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

NJ Olympians and Math

Students will identify US Olympian metal winners from NJ; research their event; determine the mathematical application associated with the event/sport.

Rubric Code: B2CXC3

By BiggieBigEBX

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Math

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: (none)

NJ Olympians and Math Sport Events and math implications
	Poor GRADE: D-C 1 pts	Fair GRADE: C-B 3 pts	Good GRADE: B-A 5 pts
Information Gathered Athlete's Background and Event Results	Poor Poor use of web site, video, word, file or other information; little or no insight into the background of athlete or event; little use of internet or time devoted to research application.	Fair Basic website information reflected throughout; some insight into the event or the athlete; some use (1 or 2 references) of the internet with adequate time spent.	Good Website information reference is broad and varied; 'out of the box' insight into the athlete and event; 3 or more references reflecting a high level of internet research.
Mathematical Application Math Associated with Sport and Athlete	Poor Very limited understanding of the event and its math application; unable to generate math questions/comments specific to the event/athlete; poor use of worksheet.	Fair Basic, concrete understanding of math's impact on the event; fair math questions/comments specific to the event; follows the general format of the worksheet.	Good Very good grasp on mathematical impact on the event/athlete; well thoughtout math questions; follows and expands upon the format of the worksheet.
Presentation Interpersonal Skills and Clarity	Poor Unclear and disorganized; information not relevant or even boring; vocal quality weak and flat; poor eye contact; poor knowledge; read from paper.	Fair Presentation is clear, but closure is missing; fair knowledge; vocal quality is adequate; eye contact is inconsistent; some elements are spoken, not read.	Good Clear presentation with closure on each athlete/event; vocal quality enhances the project; consistent eye contact; all elements are spoken involving the audience.