Skip to main content
iRubric: Design Project Assessment rubric

iRubric: Design Project Assessment rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Design Project Assessment 
Design Project Assessment
Rubrics designed to facilitate assessment of senior year design projects (This is portfolio process in action)
Rubric Code: B24776
By dzulkifli
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Safety

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Teamwork

Excellent

-Equal contribution to the project
-Works well with others
-Motivates and encourages
-Respect for others ideas
-Enthusiasm and dedication
Good
Fair
Poor

-Does not contribute towrds workload
-Works poorly with others
-Dissinterested and disrespectful of team
-Lack of enthusiasm
Technical

Excellent

-Synthesis and mastery of technical components of the project
-All applicable documentation is included (drawings, references, specifications, calculations, ROI Analysis)
-Elements of innovation and creativity
-Comprehends ethical implications of project / solution
Good
Fair
Poor

-Lack of understanding of fundamental concepts
-Technical documentation missing and or irrelevant
Communication

Excellent

-Clear and timely communication with faculty on project progress via required medium (progress reports, meetings, journal)
-Professional, clear and regular communication (updates, information gathering, etc.) with the client
-Regular and effective communication amongst team members
Good
Fair
Poor

-Little or no communication with clients, faculty and team members
Final Report

Excellent

-Follows prescribed template
-Complete and thorough referencing using bibliography (APA guidelines)
-Proper synthesis of information such that everything flows together
-Perfect grammar and proper use of technical terminology
Good
Fair
Poor

-Ignores template
-No referencing / bibliography
-Lack of cohesiveness
-Poor grammar
-Demonstrates poor effort
Presentation

Excellent

-Very well organized(flow)
-Follows prescribed format (Project statement, Introductions, Project Background, Proper Referencing, Cost Analysis, ROI Analysis, Summary, Question Period, Acknowledgements)
-Professionalism (Dress, conduct, language, eye-contact, non-defensive, relate to the audience on hand)
-High level of engagement and enthusiasm
-Wide use of visual aids (not limited to PowerPoint)
Good
Fair
Poor

-Disorganized
-Unrehersed
-Inappropriate dress
-Lack of flow between presenters
-Not speaking / connecting with the audience
-Poor grammar/language
Research

Excellent

-Documented, in-depth and applicable research into the topic
-Wide use of reserach techniques (SME's, periodicals, papers, codes, Internet, journals)
-Demonstrates clear analysis and synthesis of research for problem solving
Good
Fair
Poor

-No evidence of reserach
-Presentation of inapplicable research
-Superficial reserach
Work Ethic / Professionalism

Excellent

-Highly commited to the project
-Punctual with all aspects of the project (meetings, presentations, consultations, etc.)
-Professional demeanor at all times
-Appropriate dress and hygene when interacting with clients
-Intellectual honesty amongst team members
Good
Fair
Poor

-Little or no commitment
-Does not meet deadlines
-Does not dress appropriately when meeting clients
-Lack of professional demeanor
-Disrespectful of others work and effort
Project Management

Excellent

-Clear statement of project objective and timelines
-Clearly defined deliverables(reports, prototypes, drawings, etc)
-Documented and defined schedule of all deliverables
-Highly effective use of available resources
-Evolution of the project is very well documented
-Understands and manages cost implications of the project
-Documented list of key contacts
-Superior time management skills (effective mangement of overall workload)
Good
Fair
Poor

-No statement of project objective
-No plan of execution
-Failure to execute plan due to lack of time management skills




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16