Skip to main content
iRubric: Abbey Magiera's Participation Rubric

iRubric: Abbey Magiera's Participation Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Abbey Magiera's Participation Rubric 
Esons Participation Rubric CORE 450
Class participation is based on several important ideas: 1. We construct knowledge and learn from each other, and if you don't speak, others don't learn from you--and vice versa; 2. The evaluation of your performance is based on evidence, what can be demonstrated and observed-- you need to show what you know; 3. The more noticeable you make yourself by your participation, the more memorable you are to others when they are trying to recall who you are and what you stand for.
Rubric Code: B23B7W3
By abigailmagiera
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Participation
  Poor = D

D: Set; Cannot be changed.

1 pts

Fair = C

C: Set; Cannot be changed.

2 pts

Good = B

B: Set; Cannot be changed.

3 pts

A Game

A: Create criteria for your A game

4 pts

Evidence

At the end of the semester provide evidence to support your score for each category.

(N/A)

Class Attendance
20 %

Poor = D

Missed 3 or more classes
Fair = C

Missed 2 or more classes
Good = B

Missed 1 or more classes
A Game

Missed only 1 class due illness or necessary appointment
Evidence
Frequency of Participation
15 %

Poor = D

does not contribute or alternately dominates discussion
Fair = C

Irregularly participates, ONLY OCCASIONALLY
Good = B

initiates questions and comments, regularly participates.
A Game

initiates questions on each topic of discussion, proposes new ideas to discussed topics
Evidence
Forum/Perusall Participation
20 %

Poor = D

1-2 Annotations Posted readings, personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc.
Fair = C

3-4- Annotations. readings, personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc.
Good = B

5-6 annotations, posted personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc.
A Game

7+ annotations, shared personal experiences that connected to the material, share relevant news pieces, and connects the material to their everyday life
Evidence
Team Participation out/in class
10 %

Poor = D

Never met with group
Fair = C

Met with group occasionally and occasionally offered input to group discussion.
Good = B

Present for most group meetings and always contributed to discussion.
A Game

Present for all group meetings, and helps keep the group focused, and helps avoid tangents
Evidence
Outside Of Class Participation
5 %

Poor = D

Never participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work,etc) outside of class time.
Fair = C

Occasionally participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work,etc) outside of class time.
Good = B

Frequently participated in announced outside activities (films, lectures, relevant volunteer work,etc) outside of class time.
A Game

Participated in all announced outside activities with the exception if there is a medical reason for not going
Evidence
Questioning
5 %

Poor = D

Makes only statements, "(this is what you should do and how" Does not ask questions.
Fair = C

Asks some questions but makes mostly statements, or leading questions. Already has an answer before asking a question.
Good = B

Asks open ended questions.
When statements are made they are mostly in response to a question. When beginning to make a statement, tries to re-frame the statement into a question.
A Game

Asks open ended questions to help stimulate discussion but also asks concluding questions to help conclude a discussion that is dying down to better transition into the next discussion topic
Evidence
Authenticity
5 %

Poor = D

Makes statement or asks questions only based on what others want to hear. Relates to others as they want and not as self.
Fair = C

Takes into consideration self (feelings, thoughts, opinions, etc,) but continues to only give feedback that conforms to the other.
Good = B

Is beginning to be self-authoring, appearing to others as one appears to oneself.
A Game

Considers the perspectives provided by other students but respectfully holds their own thoughts and opinions even if they may differ from other classmates.
Evidence
Preparation
5 %

Poor = D

makes spontaneous but uninformed comments, obvious that required pre-reading not completed.
Fair = C

Comments are informed but lack completeness of comprehensive preparation
Good = B

has read assigned material and relates comments to it
A Game

Has read the material before class, has revisited the material for a better understanding, and has made comments on the readings that are connected directly to the reading, and that connect the reading to other discussion materials.
Evidence
Originality/creativity
5 %

Poor = D

restatement of readings or comments already offered
Fair = C

Unconventional ideas but may not be well thought out or practical
Good = B

presents novel view, different perspective, original approaches
A Game

Does not directly repeat what has already been said to prevent conversation from going in circles, and does not directly state what the authors/directors have explicitly stated.
Evidence
Articulation
2 %

Poor = D

mispronunciation, poor use of words, poorly organized ideas
Fair = C

Uses jargon, common expressions rather than appropriate technical terms
Good = B

clear and organized use of language, expresses ideas fluently, visual supplements
A Game

prepares ahead of time key discussion points so the ideas are clear to others, prepares visual supplements (graphs, videos, images) to build upon the discussion points
Evidence
Presentation
2 %

Poor = D

Speaks too softly for all to hear, addreses only the instructor, monotone, upspeak
Fair = C

Inconsistent in presentation, needs reminding,variable style, mannerisms
Good = B

eye contact, address all of class, audible volume, interest & inflection in voice
A Game

makes a welcoming environment for discussion, provides opinions in a respectful manner while still being strong in their own opinions, and acknowledges classmates when they present an insightful contribution to the discussion
Evidence
Vocabulary
2 %

Poor = D

Uses cliche's, mundane vocabulary, uses terms incorrectly
Fair = C

Inconsistent in use of proper terms
Good = B

demonstrates knowledge and accurate use of terms
A Game

Accurately uses vocabulary but does not make the situation so intellectually advanced where others cannot follow
Evidence
Receptive
2 %

Poor = D

defensive, demeans others' comments, talks over them, or disregards feedback
Fair = C

Is respectful and listens, but does not apply feedback
Good = B

accurately listens to and considers feedback from others
A Game

actively listens to what other classmates have to say, potentially takes notes on their ideas, and contemplates briefly before responding to provide meaningful responses.
Evidence
Inclusion
2 %

Poor = D

does not mention others or further develop ideas previously discussed
Fair = C

Implies contributions of others and bases argument on previous contributions
Good = B

builds on and relates to points made by other contributors,, harmonizes, summarizes, contrasts etc. When referring to others, uses their name.
A Game

Offers either an agreeing statement or conflicting statement, in a positive and respectful manner and acknowledges the perspectives others in the class have to offer
Evidence
Rhetoric
2 %

Poor = D

argues opinion or emotion without evidence
Fair = C

Provides weak or inconsistent evidence or reasoning
Good = B

gives evidence supporting assertions, argues logically, gives examples
A Game

gives strong evidence that supports the information being stated from credible sources
Evidence
Relevance & value
2 %

Poor = D

tangential or pedantic
Fair = C

Contributes on portions or segments, but misses the big picture
Good = B

comments are pertinent to topic and add important facts and perspectives
A Game

all comments are relevant to the topic being discussed and offers new pieces of information that help further stimulate discussion
Evidence




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98