Skip to main content
iRubric: Quest Pitch rubric

iRubric: Quest Pitch rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Quest Pitch 
Elevator Pitch
Rubric Code: B229328
By DeidreH
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 6-8, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Quest Pitch
Enter rubric description
  Needs major revisions

(N/A)

Needs some revision

(N/A)

Acceptable/Good

(N/A)

Exceptional

(N/A)

Intro/Hook
10 %

Briefly explain your idea and why you are passionate about it. Be persuasive and sell the idea to your audience.
Needs major revisions

You have not managed to convince the audience that this is a project worth pursuing.
Needs some revision

Your introduction was a little lack luster. The audience is not entirely convinced about your enthusiasm for the project.
Acceptable/Good

Your introduction was well rehearsed and the audience was able to get a sense of your enthusiasm for the project.
Exceptional

Outstanding introduction. The audience was completely blown away by the idea. You were extremely persuasive and the audience has bought into your idea completely.
My big question
15 %

The big question needs to be relevant, focused, and concise. It needs to guide the research and direction of the project.
Needs major revisions

The question is too vague and does not provide direction for the project.
Needs some revision

The question needs further refinement so that there is more focus and direction for the way forward.
Acceptable/Good

The question may need one or two minor tweaks, but on the whole it provides direction.
Exceptional

The big question is relevant and focused. it provides a clear direction for the project outcomes.
Passion with a purpose
30 %

There needs to be a clear link to the UN Sustainable Goals and/or iRESPECT values. The project must clearly addresses a problem and try to solve it.
Needs major revisions

Your project has no clear purpose or link to the UN Sustainable Goals or iRESPCT values.
You have not clearly stated how your project can be used to solve a problem for the betterment of people, animals or the environment.
Needs some revision

There is a tentative link between the UN Sustainable Goals and/or iRESPCT values.
You need to make this link more concrete so that it is clear how your project will solve a problem for the betterment of people, animals or the environment.
Acceptable/Good

The link between the UN Sustainable Goals and/or iRESPCT values is reasonably concrete.
A few minor revisions will help to clarify how your project will solve a problem for the betterment of people, animals or the environment.
Exceptional

There is a definitive link between the UN Sustainable goals and/or iRESPECT values.
Careful thought has gone into how the project will solve a problem for the betterment of people, animals or the environment.
Research put into practice
10 %

The project must attempt to successfully combine research with a practical component. Learners must attempt to practically apply what they have learnt.
Needs major revisions

The project focuses almost exclusively on either research or the practical component. There isn't a balance between the two.
Needs some revision

Further emphasis needs to be placed on either research or the practical component of the projects.
Acceptable/Good

There is a reasonable balacne between research and a practical component.
Exceptional

There is a good balance between possible research topics and the practical implementation.
Feasibility
15 %

Obstacles must be identified and possible solutions to these obstacles must be discussed
Needs major revisions

The project does not seem feasible unless major revisions are made.
Needs some revision

The project has merit but still needs revision to make it feasible.
Acceptable/Good

The project seems feasible with a few minor revisions.
Exceptional

The project seems feasible.
Response to panel's questions
10 %

The learner should be able respond to questions in a confident and self-assured manor.
Answer to the questions should reflect that the learner was well prepared and can defend their point of view, but that they are also open to constructive suggestions and criticism.
Needs major revisions

The learner lacked confidence and did not seem well prepared to answer questions.
The learner did not respond well to constructive criticism, and struggled to defend his/her point of view.
Needs some revision

The learners struggled to answer some of the questions, and wasn't always able to defend his/her idea convincingly.
The learner may have had difficulty hearing constructive criticism.
Acceptable/Good

The learner coped reasonably well under pressure and was able to answer most questions confidently.
The learner was able to defend his/her ideas but was also open to suggestions and comments from the panel
Exceptional

The learner coped well under pressure and was able to answer questions confidently.
The learner was able to clearly defend his/her ideas but was also open to suggestions and comments from the panel



Keywords:
  • PItch

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98