Skip to main content

iRubric: Administrative Assistant/Admissions Specialist rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Administrative Assistant/Admissions Specialist 
Rubric for interview questions for Admissions Assistant
Rubric Code: B2276A7
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Spiritual Health
Share how you came
to know Jesus as Lord,
and what He is
currently teaching
you.
  Poor 1 pt

Candidate does not
indicate a personal,
active relationship
with God in Christ.

(N/A)

Fair 2 pts

Candidate has a
relationship with
the Lord that
seems immature
and undeveloped.

(N/A)

Good 3 pts

Candidate has a
relationship with
the Lord but is not
currently
connected to a
growing spiritual
community.

(N/A)

Excellent 4 pts

Candidate has an
active, strong
relationship with
the Lord and is
daily growing
through personal
devotions and
service.

(N/A)

Vision Question 1

About what part of the
CHESS vision and
mission are you most
passionate?

Poor 1 pt

Candidate
demonstrated no
understanding to
articulate the
implementation of
the CHESS vision
and mission.
Fair 2 pts

Candidate
demonstrated little
understanding to
articulate the
implementation of
the CHESS vision
and mission.
Good 3 pts

Candidate
demonstrated
adequate
understanding to
articulate the
implementation of
the CHESS vision
and mission.
Excellent 4 pts

Candidate
demonstrated
signicant
understanding to
articulate the
implementation of
the CHESS vision
and mission.
Vision Question 2

On a scale of 1 to 5,
how would you rank the CHESS Core Values, and why do you put them in that order?

Poor 1 pt

Candidate is unable
to prioritize the
CHESS Core Values.
Fair 2 pts

Candidate can
minimally prioritize
the CHESS Core
Values, but does
not demonstrate
conviction.
Good 3 pts

Candidate
adequately
prioritizes the
CHESS Core Values,
but lacks conviction
on why they are
ordered in a
particular order.
Excellent 4 pts

Candidate
confidently rates
the CHESS Core
Values and is
expresses with
personal conviction
the rationale for
the order.
Vision Question 3

What do you feel are
the differences
between working for a
ministry and working
for a business?

Poor 1 pt

Candidate cannot
distinguish the
dierences in
working in a
ministry and
business.
Fair 2 pts

Candidate has
some ability to
distinguish the
dierences in
working in a
ministry and
business.
Good 3 pts

Candidate can
adequately
distinguish the
dierences in
working in a
ministry and
business.
Excellent 4 pts

Candidate has
detailed plans to
distinguish the
differences in
working in a
ministry and business.
Temperment/Postive Affect

Poor 1 pt

Poor eye contact; avoids social interactions
Fair 2 pts

Reserved, slightly detached, cool; basic social skills
Good 3 pts

Personable, welcoming, warm
Excellent 4 pts

Would be a great asset to the team!
Problem-Solving

Share about a time you created something new. How was the experience? What was the result? How did you feel?

Poor 1 pt

No example of creating something new. Externalizes responsibility; lacks ownership or collaboration
Fair 2 pts

Somewhat collaborative, expects direction for most activities.
Good 3 pts

Creative and flexible, seeks input from team and is attentive to their role in the bigger picture.
Excellent 4 pts

Ability to create and implement new concepts with proven success.
Conflict Management

Share about a time you had a difficult conversation with a co-worker. What was the outcome?

Poor 1 pt

Evidence suggests may be combative, defensive, blaming.
Fair 2 pts

Evidence suggests may be yielding or resistant.
Good 3 pts

Evidence indicates avoidance or vague and unclear.
Excellent 4 pts

Evidence suggests desires to deal with it openly and biblically, and demonstrates effective use of crucial conversations.
"Customer" Service

At CHESS, our customers are partners.
Share an example of what characteristics demonstrate stewardship in excellent customer service.

Poor 1 pt

Delayed or no response; kind but not relational; follow-up incomplete or slow
Fair 2 pts

Delayed response; cordial but not highly relational; slow or no follow-up
Good 3 pts

Prompt, kind & patient response; highly relational; follow-up may be incomplete or slow
Excellent 4 pts

Prompt, kind & patient response; thorough and willing to research for a full response; highly relational; exceptional follow-up; ongoing support
Computer Skills

Poor 1 pt

Novice: comfortable with email, attachments, word processing-- slower learner
Fair 2 pts

Comfortable with email, attachments, GSuite, no database experience, -- moderate learner
Good 3 pts

Comfortable with GSuite, Calendar, and some database experience -- Good learner
Excellent 4 pts

Expert use of spreadsheets, calendaring, Hubspot, website, GSuite, and database exprience-- quick learner
Energy

Share what energizes you and gives life to you. Share what depletes or discourages you.

Poor 1 pt

Evidence suggests they may become easily overwhelmed; slower worker
Fair 2 pts

Limited or vague evidence of basic organizational and time management skills for coping with multiple deadlines, frequent interruptions or last minute changes.
Good 3 pts

Demonstrates adequate evidence of basic organizational and time management skills for coping with multiple deadlines, frequent interruptions or last minute changes.
Excellent 4 pts

Evidence cited of exceptional organizational and time management skills for coping with multiple deadlines, frequent interruptions, and last minute changes.
Dependability

Poor 1 pt

Inconsistencies reported, no evidence provided
Fair 2 pts

Limited evidence provided
Good 3 pts

Evidence provided suggests dependability and commitment to their role.
Excellent 4 pts

Demonstrates strong personal commitment to the mission of CHESS.
Difficult Decisions

Share a time when you had to make a difficult decision between two good alternatives, and the factors you used to make your decision.

Poor 1 pt

Candidate could
not express details
of having to make a
difficult decision.
Fair 2 pts

Candidate
articulates with
vague details of
having to make a
difficult decision.
Good 3 pts

Candidate
articulates details
of having to make a
difficult decision.
Excellent 4 pts

Candidate
articulates with
clarity and
relevance details of
having to make a
difficult decision.
Habits

Share with us a habit you have developed and sustained for at least one year.

Poor 1 pt

Could not identify a habit that was sustained for 1 year.
Fair 2 pts

Identified a habit, but was not able to sustain it for 1 year.
Good 3 pts

Identified a habit and sustained it for a year.
Excellent 4 pts

Identified more than 1 habit and provided evidence of sustainability for more than 1 year.





Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58