iRubric: Global Awareness and Diversity Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Global Awareness and Diversity Rubric

A tool describing expectations, criteria, and achievement levels for executing (student) and evaluating (instructor) an assignment.

Rubric Code: AXWWB87

By Hapon13

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Humanities

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Global Awareness & Diversity A tool describing expectations, criteria, and achievement levels for executing (student) and evaluating (instructor) an assignment.
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Adequate 2 pts	Inadequate 1 pts
Human histories 25 % Demonstrates awareness of human histories and the perspectives that they create and how they affect the world.	Excellent Fully demonstrates awareness of human histories, the perspectives they create and how they affect values by providing: (a) clear & ample descriptions of those histories; (b) clear and logical warrants between histories and perspectives; shows clearly and thouroughly how perspectives affect values.	Good Demonstrates awareness of human histories, perspectives they create and how they affect values by providing clear and ample descriptions of those histories. Links histories to perspectives and shows fairly well how they affect values.	Adequate Demonstrates awareness of human histories, perspectives they create and how they affect values by providing clear despcriptions. Provides warrants between histories and perspectives or shows how perspectives affect values with limited clarity and thoroughness.	Inadequate Demonstrates awareness of human histories but does not describe these clearly or fully. Links between histories and perspectives are weak or non-existent. Fails to show how these affect values or does so unclearly.
Interconnectedness of peoples 25 % Demonstrates an understanding of the interconnectedness of all peoples throughout the world.	Excellent Demonstrates understanding by soft evidence (e.g. numerous concrete and vivid examples, illustrations, anecdotes or stories) and hard evidence (e.g. expert commentary, metric or statistical data). Hard evidence is appropriate, well interpreted, and smoothly intergrated into the text.	Good Demonstrates understanding by citing some soft evidence and some hard evidence, both of which are relevant and well intergrated into the text.	Adequate Refers to but does not fully develop relevant soft (not concrete or vivid) and/or hard (not entirely useful, judicious or well intergrated) evidence.	Inadequate Understanding seems limited and unenthusisastic. Provides limited soft and no hard evidence.
Stereotypes and prejudice 25 % Demonstrates an awareness of the existence of stereotypes and a commitment to the reduction of prejudice rooted in stereotypes.	Excellent Demonstrates awarenesss by clearly explaining what are stereotypes, providing numerous examples and strong evidence of their existence. Shows passionate commitment to reducing prejudice and suggests ways and means to do so.	Good Provides fair explanation of what are stereotypes, identifies some examples and evidence of their existence. Shows fairly passionate commitment to reducing prejudice but suggests few if any ways and means to do so.	Adequate Explains what stereotypes are and provides some examples, but provides limited evidence of their existence. Shows weak commitment, more like a wish, to reducing prejudice.	Inadequate Seems skeptical about the existence of prejudice. Struggles to explain what are stereotypes and provide evidence of their existence. Shows lack of concern about the issue.
Inclusive communities 25 % Demonstrates an awareness of the need to build inclusive communities.	Excellent Provides numerous examples of inclusiveness and exclusiveness as well as examples of alienation or overt hostility. Demonstrates accuracy, precision and fairness in reporting and providing reliable evidence of such behavior. Presents practicable plans to increase inclusivity and to deal with exclusivity.	Good Provides enough examples of inclusiveness and exclusiveness, and explains them well. Demonstrates accuracy and reliability in reporting such behavior. Presents sound ways of improving inclusivity, but in a general, non-specific manner.	Adequate Provides a few valid but vague examples of inclusiveness and exclusiveness, seemingly in a disinterested manner. Presents some ideas for improving inclusivity as a more formulaic rather than enthusiastic endeavor.	Inadequate Provides an example of inclusiveness or exclusiveness, probably with some prompting. Demonstates little if any enthusiasm and seemingly is unable to present any suggestions for change.

Keywords:

Demonstrate/awareness/understanding

Subjects:

Humanities

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric