iRubric: COUN 5310.14 Forum 1 Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

COUN 5310.14 Forum 1 Rubric

COUN 5445.12 McLeod Exercise 2 Rubric

Rubric to be used for COUN 5310 Human Development

Rubric Code: AXW925A

By pcummins

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Assessment

Grade Levels: Graduate

Step 1 (Due Saturday, 9/13, 11:55pm Due Saturday, 9/13, 11:55pm) -this week only to allow time for your group members to respond to your post
	Poor Effort at this level is less than expected and is graded as "C- or below 10 pts	Marginal Effort at this level represents developmentally appropriate understanding of the material therefore graded in the "B" to "B+" range 17.2 pts	Excellent Effort at this level evidences some mastery of the material and is graded as "A-" or "A"graded as "A-" or "A" 20 pts
Quality of Post Briefly respond (50-100 words) to the following appendix discussion question from Chapter 1: "Where does soul fit in to an understanding of human development?" Referencing the text, or other resources, would be most appropriate.	Poor Simple posts that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the key question. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.	Marginal Comments on target and reflect basic awareness of material. When personal opinion is shared, it is referenced to textual/course material.	Excellent Comments demonstrate understanding and synthesis of assigned reading material. Original thought and perspective brought to discussion through comments and additional questions regarding post.
Timeliness of Post Due Saturday, 9/13, 11:55pm) -this week only to allow time for your group members to respond to your post	Poor Post submitted 49+ hours after due date.	Marginal Post submitted within 24 hours of due date.	Excellent Post submitted on time.
Grammar/Mechanics This applies to both Step 1 (initial post) and Step 2 (replies to others)	Poor Poor spelling and grammatical errors in multiple posts/replies. Written in language that is unclear or difficult to comprehend, using frequent abbreviations or "texting" style language.	Marginal Posts/replies have few spelling and grammatical errors. Text construction is clear with few abbreviations or "texting" style language.	Excellent Posts/replies consistently show good grammar, have few or no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability.
Step 2 (Due Tuesday, 9/16, 11:55pm) Step 2 (Due Tuesday, 9/16, 11:55pm) Review the posting of each of your group members. Provide brief feedback (less than 50 words) to each member's post.
	Poor 10 pts	Marginal 17.2 pts	Excellent 20 pts
Quality of Replies Students are required to post replies to the thoughts of the other students NLT Tuesday, 9/16, 11:55pm.	Poor Simple replies that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the key question. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.	Marginal Replies are simple but show moderate insight, depth, or connection to the original post. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opinion is appropriately expressed & posts as a whole show understanding.	Excellent Replies show insight, depth, & understanding. They connect with the original post and add to that post by including references to supporting material when appropriate Personal opinion is appropriately expressed & clearly related to original post.
Quantity of Replies Respond to the initial threads of at least one other student. Respond to an additional student and receive more credit.	Poor Provided no (0) replies to the initial postings of other students.	Marginal Provided a reply to the initial postings of one (1) other student	Excellent Provided replies to the initial postings of two or more (2+) students.

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Discuss this rubric