iRubric: Hamlet Discussion rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Hamlet Discussion

Hamlet 1302 discussion

Rubric Code: AXC6AXX

By Sherryneric

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Reflection

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Hamlet Discussion
	Did not complete (N/A)	Poor 5 pts	Fair 10 pts	Good 15 pts	Excellent 20 pts
The Ghost	Did not complete Did not address this element	Poor Simplistic analysis of the ghost and has limited or no examples. Little or no originality. Does not address multiple appearances and lacks thoroughness.	Fair Somewhat analyzes the ghost in two versions of hamlet with examples but there is little original insight - may be simplistic. may only discuss one appearances of the ghost and may not be thorough in comparison	Good Successfully analyzes the ghost in two versions of hamlet with examples and mostly original insight. may only address one appearance and compares both versions	Excellent Successfully analyzes the ghost in two versions of hamlet with examples and original insight. Discusses multiple appearances of the ghost and compares both versions thoroughly
The Madness	Did not complete Did not address this element	Poor Chooses sides but lacks validity or support about Hamlet's madness. Missing examples and details. Missing the soldier scene in the response. does not compare madness between two versions.	Fair Chooses sides and creates a valid argument about Hamlet's madness. Missing examples and details. Does not addresses the soldier scene in the response. Simply compares madness between two versions.	Good Chooses sides and creates a valid and supported argument about Hamlet's madness. May not give examples and details. May not Addresses the soldier scene in the response. Thoroughly compares madness between two versions.	Excellent Chooses sides and creates a valid and supported argument about Hamlet's madness. Gives examples and details. Addresses the soldier scene in the response. Thoroughly compares madness between two versions.
The Revenge	Did not complete Did not address this element	Poor Does not define Revenge. Discusses Hamlet's part in "revenge" in this play but lacks examples and details. OR Discusses Hamlet's success in regards to revenge but lacks details and support. Does not compare the two versions.	Fair Define Revenge. Discusses Hamlet's part in "revenge" in this play but lacks examples and details. Discusses Hamlet's success in regards to revenge but lacks details and support. May or may not compares the two versions.	Good Define Revenge. Thoroughly discusses Hamlet's part in "revenge" in this play but has few examples and details. Thoroughly discusses Hamlet's success in regards to revenge but has few details and support. May or may not compare the two versions.	Excellent Define Revenge. Thoroughly discusses Hamlet's part in "revenge" in this play supported by examples and details. Thoroughly discusses Hamlet's success in regards to revenge with details and support. Compares the two versions.
Yorick's Skull	Did not complete Did not address this element	Poor Describes or mentions Yorick's skull, but does not address the importance within the play. Does not compare the use of the skull in both versions.	Fair Discusses the importance of Yorick's skull within the play but provides no details and examples that support the argument. may or may not compare the use of the skull in both versions.	Good Thoroughly discusses the importance of Yorick's skull within the play but may have few details and examples that support the argument. may or may not compare the use of the skull in both versions.	Excellent Thoroughly discusses the importance of Yorick's skull within the play and provides details and examples that support the argument. Compares the use of the skull in both versions.
Resoponse #1	Did not complete Did not respond to a classmate	Poor Includes one question. At least 2 sentences. Response to student discussion lacks depth or insight. AND Question is simplistic and lower level.	Fair Includes one question. At least 3 sentences. Response to student discussion lacks depth or insight. OR Question may be simplistic and lower level.	Good Includes one question. At least 3 sentences. Mostly thoughtful and insightful response to student discussion with in depth questioning that may take the discussion to a new level.	Excellent Includes one question. At least 3 sentences. Thoughtful and insightful response to student discussion with in depth questioning that takes the discussion to a new level.
Response #2	Did not complete Did not respond to a classmate	Poor Includes one question. At least 2 sentences. Response to student discussion lacks depth or insight. AND Question is simplistic and lower level.	Fair Includes one question. At least 3 sentences. Response to student discussion lacks depth or insight. Question may be simplistic and lower level.	Good Includes one question. At least 3 sentences. Mostly thoughtful and insightful response to student discussion with in depth questioning that may take the discussion to a new level.	Excellent Includes one question. At least 3 sentences. Thoughtful and insightful response to student discussion with in depth questioning that takes the discussion to a new level.

Keywords:

Hamlet, shakespeare, english, ENGL1302

Subjects:

English

Types:

Reflection

Discuss this rubric