Skip to main content
iRubric: Rubric for Apologia Chemistry Lab Report in lab notebook

iRubric: Rubric for Apologia Chemistry Lab Report in lab notebook

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rubric for Apologia Chemistry Lab Report in lab notebook 
high school lab reports
Rubric Code: AXAAXW5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Chemistry  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric General Lab Report
100 %
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Very Poor

0 pts

Title
5 pts

Excellent

Title is the same as the one given by the book. Date and lab number are documented. Proper punctuation, no spelling errors.
Good

Title is the same as the one given by the book. Date and lab number are documented. 1-2 errors in spelling and/or punctuation
Fair

Title or lab number is different than the one provided by the book. Or date is missing. Proper punctuation, no spelling errors.
Poor

Title or lab number is different than the one provided by the book. Or date is missing. 1-2 errors in spelling and/or punctuation.
Very Poor

Title and lab number are very different from the book. Or Title and lab number are missing. Date is missing.
Format (Neatness)
5 pts

Excellent

Format followed exactly. All 5 sections included, titled, and have complete sentences. Report is neatly written.
Good

Format almost followed. All 5 sections included and titled but out of order. Report is neatly written.
Fair

Format almost followed. Most of the 5 sections included. Or incomplete sentences used. Report is neatly written.
Poor

Format not followed. Some sections included, or no titles used. Or hand writing is very difficult to read. Information is poorly placed.
Very Poor

No format. Handwriting is illegible.
Purpose, Equipment, & Procedure
20 pts

Excellent

No changes needed to purpose, equipment, or procedure. Everything is properly documented. Proper punctuation, no spelling errors.
Good

No changes needed to purpose, equipment, or procedure. All properly documented. 1 - 2 errors in punctuation or spelling.
Fair

1 change to purpose, equipment, or procedure not documented.
Poor

>1 change to purpose, equipment, or procedure not documented.
Very Poor

Purpose, equipment or procedure section missing.
Hypothesis
10 pts

Excellent

Hypothesis is clearly stated. Proper punctuation, no spelling errors.
Good

Hypothesis is clearly stated. 1 - 2 errors in punctuation or spelling.
Fair

Hypothesis is confusing. At least 1 change is required.
Poor

>1 change required
Very Poor

Hypothesis is missing.
Methods
20 pts

Excellent

Methods are clearly stated. Procedure is reproducible based on description. Proper punctuation, no spelling errors.
Good

Methods are clearly stated. 1 - 2 errors in punctuation or spelling.
Fair

At least 1 change is required.
Poor

>1 change required
Very Poor

Methods section is missing.
Results
15 pts

Excellent

Representation of the data is accurate, detailed, & easy to understand. Graphs &/or tables included where appropriate. Detailed list of observations included.
Good

Representation of the data is accurate, but not detailed. Graphs &/or tables included where appropriate. Detailed list of observations included.
Fair

Representation of the data is accurate, but somewhat difficult to understand. Graphs &/or tables not included where appropriate. List of observations not detailed.
Poor

Data is inaccurate. List of observations is not detailed.
Very Poor

Data is missing and/or observations are missing.
Calculations Page
10 pts

Excellent

All information provided. Formulas & calculations neatly written out with correct units & answers.
Good

Formulas & calculations neatly written out with correct units & answers. All information provided. 1-2 errors in spelling, punctuation, or calculations.
Fair

Formulas & calculations neatly written out with 1-2 incorrect units & answers.
Poor

Formulas &/or calculations not neatly written out, missing units or steps. 1 -2 errors in spelling, punctuation, or calculations.
Very Poor

Data page or written calculations missing.
Conclusion
15 pts

Excellent

Purpose is restated. Shows clear connection between objective & results. Includes new information learned. Thought process from data/observations to conclusion clearly documented & easy to follow. Proper punctuation, no spelling errors.
Good

Restates purpose but unclear connection between purpose & results. Includes new information learned. Thought process from data/observations to conclusion documented but difficult to follow. Proper punctuation, no spelling errors.
Fair

Restates purpose but unclear connection between purpose & the results. Thought process from data/observations to conclusion cannot be followed.
Poor

Purpose is not restated and no clear connection to results achieved. Thought process from data/observations to conclusion is not included.
Very Poor

Conclusion is incorrect, not supported by the data or missing.



Keywords:
  • science lab







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16