Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Spanish Language and Culture Presentational Speaking rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Spanish Language and Culture Presentational Speaking
AP Spanish Language and Culture Presentational Speaking
Rubric Code:
AX79C2W
By
kgotwols
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Cultural Comparison
Poor
1 pts
Weak
2 pts
Fair
3 pts
Good
4 pts
Strong
5 pts
Comprehensibility
Poor
Barely understandable, with frequent or significant errors that impede comprehensibility
Weak
Partially understandable, with errors that force interpretation and cause confusion for the listener
Fair
Generally understandable, with errors that may impede comprehensibility
Good
Fully understandable, with some errors which do not impede comprehensibility
Strong
Fully understandable, with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not impede comprehensibility
Pronunciation and Intonation
Poor
Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend; errors impede comprehensibility.
Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually does not improve comprehensibility
Weak
Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend at times; errors impede comprehensibility.
Clarification or self-correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility.
Fair
Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response generally comprehensible; errors occasionally impede comprehensibility. Clarification or self-correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility.
Good
Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response mostly comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility. Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually improves comprehensibility.
Strong
Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility. Clarification or self-correction (if present) improves comprehensibility.
Vocabulary and Grammar
Poor
Very few vocabulary resources. Little or no control of grammar, syntax, and usage.
Weak
Limited vocabulary and idiomatic language. Limited control of grammar, syntax, and usage.
Fair
Appropriate but basic vocabulary and idiomatic language.
Some control of grammar, syntax, and usage.
Good
Varied and generally appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language. General control of grammar, syntax, and usage.
Strong
Varied, appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language. Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax, and usage, with few errors.
Treatment of Topic
Poor
Almost no treatment of topic within the context of the task
Weak
Unsuitable treatment of topic within the context of the task
Fair
Suitable treatment of topic within the context of the task
Good
Generally effective treatment of topic within the context of the task
Strong
Effective treatment of topic within the context of the task
Organization
Poor
Little or no organization; absence of transitional elements and cohesive devices
Weak
Limited organization; ineffective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Fair
Some organization; limited use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Good
Organized presentation; some effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Strong
Organized presentation; effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Effort
Poor
Student did not stay with, or refused to stay, within the group. Student would rather "work on his/her part at home." Student was both distracted and off task. Amount of effort displayed is unacceptable. S/he did not work well with others.
Weak
Student shows very little effort. S/he rarely stayed within the group, only to occasionally "checking in" on group members. Student was both distracted and off task. Amount of effort displayed is unacceptable.
Fair
Student shows minimal effort. S/he strayed from the group more than once, but at least s/he worked well with most members of the group throughout the allotted class time. Student was off-task about half the time.
Good
Student shows a decent amount of effort. S/he may have strayed from the group once due to distraction, but s/he worked well with all members of the group throughout the allotted class time.
Strong
Student shows a great amount of effort. S/he does not stray from the group--s/he worked well with all members of the group throughout the allotted class time.
Keywords:
AP, Presentational Speaking, Cultural Comparison
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.