iRubric: Video Parody rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Video Parody

groups will choose a period or event in history to create a video parody. It will be 10 - 15 minutes in length.

Rubric Code: A969A5

By PAHart

Ready to use

Private Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12

APWH parody
	Excellent 5 pts	Very Good 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Needs Improvement 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Research	Excellent Demonstrated a full understanding of time period chosen. Coherently answered all follow up questions to the parody.	Very Good Demonstrated a strong understanding of the time period chosen. Could answer follow up questions to the parody.	Good Has some understanding of time period chosen. Could not completely answer follow up questions to the parody.	Needs Improvement Has a slight understanding of time period chosen. Had trouble answering follow up questions about the parody.	Poor Has no understanding of time period chosen. Could not answer follow up questions about parody.
Video	Excellent Film is very visually appealing. Cinematography is well organized. Soundtrack enhances viewing of parody video.	Very Good Film is visually appealing. Cinematography is fairly organized. Soundtrack compliments viewing the parody.	Good Film is visually tolerable. Cinematography is semi-organized. Soundtrack does not take away from viewing the parody.	Needs Improvement Film is hard to watch. Cinematography is not organized. Soundtrack takes away from viewing ability.	Poor Film is unwatchable. Cinematography is non existent. Has no soundtrack.
Editing	Excellent Excellent visual effects to support the video. Segments are sequential and transition nicely.	Very Good Appropriate use of visual effects to support video. Segments are sequential but transitions could be better.	Good Some visual effects that may or may not take away from video. Segments may be sequential and transitions are evident.	Needs Improvement Poor choice of visual effects and has no correlation to video. Segments and transitions take away from the parody.	Poor No visual effects. No editing evident, segments were filmed and thrown together.