Skip to main content
iRubric: Physical Diagnosis II MPA 520 rubric

iRubric: Physical Diagnosis II MPA 520 rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Physical Diagnosis II MPA 520 
Physical Diagnosis II MPA 520
Zebras in Medicine
Rubric Code: A69X3C
By ajgabriel
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Case Presentation
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Average

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

0 pts

Presentation Style
20 %

Does the student articulate well with confidence, professionalism, eye contact, and voice projection while presenting?
Excellent

The student appears confident, professional, makes excellent eye contact and voice projection. Delivers presentation with fluent speech and pertinent vocabulary.
Good

The student appears confident, professional, makes good eye contact and voice projection. Delivers presentation with fluent speech and pertinent vocabulary.
Average

The student appears moderately confident making good eye contact but presentation is delivered with mispronunciation of pertinent vocabulary. Difficult to hear at times.
Fair

The student appears nervous and has minimal eye contact. Presentation is delivered with mispronunciation of pertinent vocabulary. Difficult to hear.
Poor

The student does not make eye contact with the audience. Presentation is delivered with use of slang and mispronunciation of words. The student was unprofessional.
Presentation Guidelines
20 %

The student will follow format provided to present a case study of a patient that will include the patient's history, laboratory exams/test, disease state review, medication review and plan. Are there spelling/grammar issues?
Excellent

Presentation involved a complex patient and meets all of the guidelines.
Good

Presentation meets most of the guidelines.
Average

Presentation meets most of the guidelines.
Fair

Presentation does not meet most of the guidelines or there was inadequate information presented.
Poor

Presentation meets few of the guidelines or not based on an actual patient.
Time Limit/References
20 %

Does the presentation meet the time limit guidelines? Accurate reference citations? Appropriate use of literature?
Excellent

The presentation met the minimum time limit. Accurate citations. Appropriate literature use.
Good

The presentation fell within the time limit. Accurate citations. One inappropriate literature source.
Average

The presentation met the minimum time limit. One inappropriate literature source.
Fair

The presentation exceeded the maximum time limit. Some slides not cited. Few inappropriate literature source.
Poor

The presentation fell short of the minimum time limit. All slides not cited. Several inappropriate literature sources.
Content
20 %

Is there adequate information presented? Is it organized in a logical progression of ideas? Are appropriate objectives established and addressed?
Excellent

Adequate information presented. The information is well organized and logical. Objectives are appropriate and addressed.
Good

Adequate information presented. The information is well organized and logical. Objectives are either not appropriate or addressed.
Average

Adequate information presented. The information is well organized but it does not remain focused. Objectives are either not appropriate or addressed.
Fair

Too much information presented. The information is not organized in a logical manner, does not remain focused. Objectives are not appropriate or all addressed.
Poor

Not enough information presented. The information is not organized in a logical manner, does not remain focused. Objectives not appropriate or all addressed.
Conclusion
20 %

Is the student able to answer questions effectively? Patient adequately assessed and plan (safety, efficacy, cost) is appropriate. Primary literature is adequately summarized and statistical and clinical significance is determined appropriately.
Excellent

Student is successful in answering questions. Assessment and plan is appropriate.
Good

Student is successful in answering most questions. Assessment and plan is appropriate.
Average

Student is successful in answering most questions. Assessment or plan is incomplete.
Fair

Student is successful in answering few questions. Assessment and plan is incomplete.
Poor

Student is unable to answer questions. Assessment and plan is not appropriate. Literature significance is not appropriate.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98