iRubric: Mental Health Paper- Movie observation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Mental Health Paper- Movie observation

3 to 4 page paper reviewing suggested movie and identify the disease process indicated

Rubric Code: A3WAAW

By pclary

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Psychology

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: (none)

Enter rubric title
	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Completion of worksheet	Good Completion using all 5 following points. 1.Identifies the movie reviewed 2. Identifies primary character 3. Identifies disease process/ symptoms. 4. Client History as related to disease. 5. Treatment plan identified.	Fair Worksheet addresses only 3 to 4 of the 5 items on worksheet.	Poor Worksheet is incomplete with less than 3 of the 5 areas addressed.
Paper-Disease identification	Good 1. Paper identifies the mental disorder portrayed by the character. 2. Signs and symptoms of the character are discussed. 3. Comparison of characters s/sx with the s/sx as identified with research of the disorder.	Fair Paper addresses 2 of the 3 points as listed.	Poor Paper only identifies 1 of 3 points as listed.
Treatment	Good 1. Discussed treatment options for character with disorder as identified. 2. Discussed expectations of treatment/ expected results. 3. Discussed patient teaching needed for treatment as identified.	Fair Discussed 2 of 3 points as identified.	Poor Discussed less than 2 of 3 points.
Grammar/ Page Requirement	Good 1. Uses appropriate grammar less than 3 grammatical mistakes.	Fair Grammatical errors 4 to 5.	Poor Grammatical errors 6 or more
Paper requirement	Good Double spaced Body of paper is 3 to 4 pages in length	Fair Body of Paper is 2 to pages in length	Poor Body of paper is 1 page in length.
Reference page	Good Reference page is included and meets MLA or APA requirements.	Fair Reference page incuded but not proper format.	Poor No reference page included.
References- appropriateness	Good References used are from appropriate sources: textbook, psychological websites, medical journals, etc uses 3 or more references	Fair 2 References used from appropriate resources	Poor 1 Reference used or failure to use appropriate resources such as: Wikipedia, novels, etc