Skip to main content

iRubric: Written Assignment rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Written Assignment 
Written Assignment
Rubric Code: A339C8
By wenjenn
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Written Assignment
Assessment
  Poor

Review of basic requirements and concepts is needed.

(N/A)

Fair

Requirements and concepts are adequately understood; review of these elements and attention to detail may improve performance.

(N/A)

Acceptable

Firm understanding of requirements and concepts; attention to detail should correct noted deficiencies.

(N/A)

Excellent

Superior understanding of requirements and concepts; make noted adjustments and continue to produce superb work.

(N/A)

Points

Total Possible:

Total Earned:
Poor

Max:

Earned:
Fair

Max:

Earned:
Acceptable

Max:

Earned:
Excellent

Max:

Earned:
Format

Title Page
Abstract
Content (In-text Citations)
Reference Page
Poor

Three of the four elements were missing.

SEVERE ERRORS noted in all present elements.

Severe errors in title page, missing abstract, missing in-text citations, missing reference page.
Fair

Two of the four elements were missing.

SIGNIFICANT ERRORS noted in present elements.

Significant errors in title page, missing or incorrect abstract, missing or incorrect in-text citations, missing or incorrect reference page.
Acceptable

One of the four elements were missing.

MINOR ERRORS noted in present elements.

Minor errors in title page, missing or incorrect abstract, missing or incorrect in-text citations, missing or incorrect reference page.
Excellent

All elements were present without error or with minor errors.

All areas present with MINOR ERRORS noted.
Structure: Organization/Readability

Assignment prepared in a logical, coherent manner.
Poor

Information presented was poorly placed throughout the work.

Information presented did not flow; lacked cohesiveness.

Information presented was extremely difficult to read and confusing.
Fair

Some areas of the work were inappropriately placed.

Choppy, incomplete presentation of information reduced quality of work.

Topics were not properly aligned, resulting in confusion for the reader.
Acceptable

Information was presented logically and in an appropriate order.

Work flowed well and ideas were easily followed.

Minor instances of confusion were noted; confusion did not significantly reduce the quality of work.
Excellent

Articulated well and presented information logically and clearly.

Ideas were easily understood and followed.

Work was easy to read and author's position was clear.
Content

Elements of the assignment were appropriately addressed.
Poor

No elements of the assignment were addressed.

Work was not related to the assignment as noted in the course syllabus.
Fair

Several elements of the assignment were missing.

Work was minimally related to the assignment as noted in the course syllabus.
Acceptable

Most elements of the assignment were addressed.

Work related to the assignment as noted in the course syllabus with minimal exclusion of assigned elements.
Excellent

All elements of the assignment were addressed.

Work appropriately addressed each area of the assignment as noted in the course syllabus.
Critical Thinking Skills

Critical analysis of information, use of additional resources to support claims, evaluation of various theories and concepts.
Poor

Weak analysis of information was present.

Resources other than the course text were not used in developing and supporting claims.

Critical evaluation of the theories and concepts presented was not present.
Fair

Minimal analysis of information was present.

Few resources were used to support information presented.

Minimal evaluation of theories and concepts was noted.
Acceptable

Provided good analysis of the topic.

Several resources were used to support information presented.

Theories and concepts related to the assignment were presented and evaluated appropriately.
Excellent

Unusually sharp insight into material was noted.

Initiated thoughtful analysis of the topic.

Used multiple resources to support work.

Addressed many sides of an issue and all required elements of the assignment.

Integrated theories and concepts previously learned from this and other disciplines; anticipated next steps in progression of ideas.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243